Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Swearinger in the 2nd?


ThatNiggaManny

Recommended Posts

A couple of weeks ago I was saying that I wanted Cyprien at 14. If he is at 44 then I think you have to take, would be BPA (or close to it) and fills a need. Swearinger is a backup plan

Agreed but I feel like Cyprien is gonna be gone before our pick. Thats why I say Swearinger and also because he was a Gamecock lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Swearinger can put a solid hit on somebody, but his cover skills are slightly above average at best. I agree, Cyprien should be the choice here, but if he isn't, I think a good pick would be TE Zach Ertz (if he is still there too). He is a big time playmaker that will be gone after the second round. We can find solid DB's in the later rounds seeing how deep this draft is at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Swearinger can put a solid hit on somebody, but his cover skills are slightly above average at best. I agree, Cyprien should be the choice here, but if he isn't, I think a good pick would be TE Zach Ertz (if he is still there too). He is a big time playmaker that will be gone after the second round. We can find solid DB's in the later rounds seeing how deep this draft is at the position.

Lots of talk that San Fran is going to take him at top of 2nd round

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They will be if they extend Young but I don't think we're there just yet. Morgan and Canales are tied and I don't believe Tepper is going to go look for a new front office for Bryce as things stand.
    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
×
×
  • Create New...