Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Over/Under sack totals for 2013 with Star and KK added

SIGCHI222

By SIGCHI222,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

I actually expect around the same, maybe a little bit more. I think the presence of Star and the spelling of players to remain fresh is gonna apply more pressure. And more pressure means more inconsistencies from the QB. We will be a better team regardless of more sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

You also have to consider blitzes. With Star taking on a double team and CJ getting the attention of a back or TE, that should leave some lanes to the QB open for LBs and DBs.

I also think you need to consider that we will be fresher, able to apply better pressure late in games.

They should get 50+, which is about 3 per game.

I think the biggest change you will see will be in the interception department. QBs cannot step up and they make mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ItsPantone278 Newbie

ItsPantone278

Posted
Posted

This takes a ton of pressure off of Cam. He can develop as the feature player with out having to be the only attraction. The dline unit in front of the play of Kuechly could end up being the strength of the team more so than the play of Cam. He may even see less scrutiny for his mistakes because he will get extra opportunities to make the game winning plays. Sacks are momentum building plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SIGCHI222 Newbie

SIGCHI222

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Went from Big KK to KK, just a shortening of a nickname. Guess double size gave him KK, big guy, Big KK. He covers it in his interview.

I can hear the crowds now with LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKE, BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE, TDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD,

MONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY, KRAKEN (doesn't really lend itself to a long chant), STAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR and KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!

I am not drunk posting again, this is my sobe3r opinion...as far as you know.

50+ sacks peoples. Get on board the Panther D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...