100 posts required to start new thread

[Zod]

In an effort to minimize the disruption of people with no life who seem to take joy in spending a lot of time on annoying things that are undone in 2 clicks, I have once again instituted a 100 post requirement before a new thread can be created.

 

A custom query has been run to make this retroactive. So if you used to be able to make topics but now can't, you will again when you hit 100 posts.

 

 

That is all.

 

 

 

[logic1977]

Yay!

[Zod]

Upon further review I have decided to increase the requirement to 320 posts

[DOMOMAN]

Guess it's back to lurking for me

[rayzor]

[rayzor]

Guess it's back to lurking for me

the only way you can participate is if you start threads?

[BelgianPantherFan]

I have no problem with this.

 

#startsspammingsoicanmakeathread

[Toundra]

Bwood must be that (_°_) from the Charlotte observer forum.. well.. back then.

[TheRumGone]

Bwood will be back.

[G spot]

how about for members under ___ post count, have mods approve the thread before it can be posted, a prescreen?

[Zod]

Its impossible to perma ban anyone if they have absolutely no life and there is no end to their desperation to be one of the most pathetic people on the internet.

 

All we can do is put up roadblocks to discourage people from doing so.

[therealmjl]

Awesomw.

[ThatNiggaManny]

Well at least I have my dign....nevermind.

[top dawg]

Upon further review I have decided to increase the requirement to 320 posts

After last night's "gay" thread, this is warranted.

 

I've seen proclamations many times that didn't work, or didn't stick. I hope this time is different.

 

Editing thread title to reflect 320 may tamp down confusion.