Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quarterback Stats in Wins and Losses


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

Found this on reddit and thought it was pretty interesting, it really highlights how mistake free Cam has to be (which we already knew) compared to a lot of other QBs in order to notch a win.  Over two years he only averages a 0.58 INT% (the lowest in the league other than limited sample size of Jake Locker) in wins and a pretty high INT % in losses, due to us losing pretty much every game he's ever thrown a single pick in.  Anyways without further adieu, here's the list...

 

a2buc5.png

 

 

But yeah, offseason.

 

 

... and Aaron Rodgers is a fuging madman.

 

link to the reddit thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/1eywem/quarterback_stats_in_wins_and_losses/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta feel a little bad for Sanchez. Not too long ago he was in AFCCG's and organizing Camp Sanchez out in Cali with his receivers during the Summer. Now the dude is getting tossed under the bus at every stop. I'm sure Touchdown Jesus made life easier for him last year.

Regarding Cam, all these stats come back to coaching IMO. Our inability to hold a lead or recover from a turnover is pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

Kansas City game was a perfect example of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

 

Good points. 

 

Also in 2012, the defense allowed the opposition too much TOP before they allowed them to score.

 

They would almost been better off, letting the opposition score quicker, giving Cam and the offense more possessions/opportunities. "Bend, But Don't Break", can be time consuming. Lol

 

The Panther D, also made virtually no big plays (turnovers, mind you the big stops you mentioned) late games, and certainly not after Cam turnovers late in games. This is what cemented Cam's losses following turnovers, or even after he took leads late in games or 4th quarters. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points.

Also in 2012, the defense allowed the opposition too much TOP before they allowed them to score.

They would almost been better off, letting the opposition score quicker, giving Cam and the offense more possessions/opportunities. "Bend, But Don't Break", can be time consuming. Lol

The Panther D, also made virtually no big plays (turnovers, mind you the big stops you mentioned) late games, and certainly not after Cam turnovers late in games. This is what cemented Cam's losses following turnovers, or even after he took leads late in games or 4th quarters.

Spot on. The lack of " game changing" plays was sorely lacking from this defense. I think this year will (hopefully) provide more playmaking ability on the defense. By doing so Cam will not be forced to be as conservative, in that a turn over will not be a killing blow for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think his football IQ is well below average. I do not think he can read defenses at all. He is not the long term answer. I'm getting worried about DC. I think he has problems seeing the big picture for each game. Some people can't accept it, but this game is greatly affected by momentum. It's hard to explain but you can just feel his decisions break it at least two or three times a game (I think he is pretty solid when it comes to 4th down decisions). My biggest concern is this. You have seen these coaches time and time again. For some reason you have these coaches that absolutely will not go with what is working. We need a name for these coaches, what is it? If something is working great, they just do not have the intelligence to comprehend that something working is actually good for their team. They cannot understand this. AND REPORTERS NEED TO CALL THIS OUT. Rushing was insane for the past two games...ok let's take half his carries away and have Bryce air it out (look at the attempts he had). The reporters need to freaking ask "((this)) was working, you didn't do ((this)), do you consider that bad coaching? If so, why? If not, why do you defend doing the opposite of what it best?" Anyone knows you keep doing something until they stop it. But you have these coaches that think the are going to pull a fast one on them and do the thing that is not working. Dave is starting to remind me of that guy in the movie Kung Pow. I think his name was Weeblow or something, he had those squeaky shoes when he ran around. The Kung Fu masters trained him wrong as a joke, so he did things to get the crap beat out of him instead of winning the fight. I am going to start calling Dave Canales WEEBLOW if he keeps doing the opposite of what would win. But seriously, if he is going to be that type of coach, I would honestly get rid of him after this season. You 100% do not want a coach with this flaw...they may have one good fluke season but it will be years of terrible teams.
    • I mean the Bronco's only won by 1, but no one there is complaining.
    • A QB who can't consistently throw the ball 20 yards downfield has no business being a starting QB in this league. That is a backup QB who you put in there to manage a game when your starter goes down.
×
×
  • Create New...