Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quarterback Stats in Wins and Losses


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

Found this on reddit and thought it was pretty interesting, it really highlights how mistake free Cam has to be (which we already knew) compared to a lot of other QBs in order to notch a win.  Over two years he only averages a 0.58 INT% (the lowest in the league other than limited sample size of Jake Locker) in wins and a pretty high INT % in losses, due to us losing pretty much every game he's ever thrown a single pick in.  Anyways without further adieu, here's the list...

 

a2buc5.png

 

 

But yeah, offseason.

 

 

... and Aaron Rodgers is a fuging madman.

 

link to the reddit thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/1eywem/quarterback_stats_in_wins_and_losses/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta feel a little bad for Sanchez. Not too long ago he was in AFCCG's and organizing Camp Sanchez out in Cali with his receivers during the Summer. Now the dude is getting tossed under the bus at every stop. I'm sure Touchdown Jesus made life easier for him last year.

Regarding Cam, all these stats come back to coaching IMO. Our inability to hold a lead or recover from a turnover is pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

Kansas City game was a perfect example of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason we lose when Cam throws an int is a function of the defense. The inability to get three and out after a turnover, basically they can't stop an offense with a short field to drive. With the additions on the line this year, and assuredly in years to come, Cam will be helped indirectly with the team having a better ability to overcome turnovers as a result of better D-line play. As long as the secondary can produce average play, we will see marked defensive improvement.

 

Good points. 

 

Also in 2012, the defense allowed the opposition too much TOP before they allowed them to score.

 

They would almost been better off, letting the opposition score quicker, giving Cam and the offense more possessions/opportunities. "Bend, But Don't Break", can be time consuming. Lol

 

The Panther D, also made virtually no big plays (turnovers, mind you the big stops you mentioned) late games, and certainly not after Cam turnovers late in games. This is what cemented Cam's losses following turnovers, or even after he took leads late in games or 4th quarters. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points.

Also in 2012, the defense allowed the opposition too much TOP before they allowed them to score.

They would almost been better off, letting the opposition score quicker, giving Cam and the offense more possessions/opportunities. "Bend, But Don't Break", can be time consuming. Lol

The Panther D, also made virtually no big plays (turnovers, mind you the big stops you mentioned) late games, and certainly not after Cam turnovers late in games. This is what cemented Cam's losses following turnovers, or even after he took leads late in games or 4th quarters.

Spot on. The lack of " game changing" plays was sorely lacking from this defense. I think this year will (hopefully) provide more playmaking ability on the defense. By doing so Cam will not be forced to be as conservative, in that a turn over will not be a killing blow for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...