Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL's Best/Worst Contracts

CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

CBSSports La Canfora took the liberty to list what he thinks are the best and worst contracts in the NFL, and here is what he came up with...

 

Link: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22351108/nfls-worst-contracts-sanchez-just-the-start-of-the-jets-overspending

 

Worst

 

Jonathan Stewart -- Carolina Panthers ($3.2M cash; $3M cap): Stewart looked like about the fourth-best option in this crowded backfield in 2012, and even after redoing his deal to stay, this figure still seems bloated. De'Angelo Williams (another strong candidate for this list) remains with the Panthers, Cam Newton is becoming the best rushing quarterback perhaps in NFL history, and fullback Mike Tolbert sees a lot of the ball around the goal line, with seven touchdowns himself. In an era where running backs have been largely devalued, and none were taken in the first round this spring, that's a lot of money for a role player at this position.

 

Best

 

Cam Newton -- Carolina Panthers ($2.4M cash; $6M cap); Robert Griffin III -- Washington ($1.4M cash; $4.8M cap); Andrew Luck -- Indianapolis ($1.4M cash; $5M cap):I've combined all three of these guys -- all of them a top-two overall pick or higher in the past two drafts prior to 2013, because all look like true franchise quarterbacks, all have set some sort of rookie quarterback record or another, and all will be stuck playing for this through 2013. Newton, who is entering his third year, will be the first test case for the new CBA when it comes to extensions and options.

 

Luke Kuechly -- Carolina Panthers ($961,000 cash; $2.9M cap): I didn't want to put too many second-year players on this list, but given the dearth of impact inside linebackers these days, and this kid's tackling-machine numbers as a rookie, he's earned his way on it. He looks like the leader of the Panthers defense and their on-field brain for years to come ... and it will be years before he is paid like anything close to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKPantherFan Apprentice

AKPantherFan

Posted
Posted

With all the fuss with DeLo in the past, folks should honestly look at this with value. Stewart has never out done Dwill in YPC over his time here and has yet to separate himself with enough distance to justify his contract, specially considering the fact that Dwill re-structured his contract and has been the most proven RB in Panther history.......

 

Love Stewart, know he is younger, but he has never proven he is the future...

 

We are blessed to have them both + Tolbert + barner, but the $$$ is a waste.... (isn't that what everyone was saying about DeWill before he re-structured and he has ALWAYS been our homerun threat and not to mention healthy)

 

 

Flame away....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

he's not wrong. both his and williams were bad. williams got rectified somewhat, but both were still bad.

From a cash/cap standpoint, his numbers are still both bigger than Stewarts this year. His is less worse than the original....both those guys should of been on the list.

Little surprised Beason wasn't there

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

From a cash/cap standpoint, his numbers are still both bigger than Stewarts this year. His is less worse than the original....both those guys should of been on the list.

Little surprised Beason wasn't there

totally agreed. forgot about beason. good catch. at least he'll be getting a lot of snaps this year, but he hasn't played but a handful of games the past two years and lost his job to a rookie and he's getting paid how much? ridiculous. he should have absolutely made that list. i think lacanfora was just being nice in not having more than stewart on that list. we should have had 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frizzy350 Apprentice

Frizzy350

Posted
Posted

With all the fuss with DeLo in the past, folks should honestly look at this with value. Stewart has never out done Dwill in YPC over his time here and has yet to separate himself with enough distance to justify his contract, specially considering the fact that Dwill re-structured his contract and has been the most proven RB in Panther history.......

 

Love Stewart, know he is younger, but he has never proven he is the future...

 

We are blessed to have them both + Tolbert + barner, but the $$$ is a waste.... (isn't that what everyone was saying about DeWill before he re-structured and he has ALWAYS been our homerun threat and not to mention healthy)

 

 

Flame away....

 

Stew also cant stay healthy.  Since we've got tolbert i'd be fine if we could move stew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

My how the mighty have fallen. Few months ago J-stew could do no wrong.

Healthy, he is still the bed overall RB at this point....

Still overpaid. But I think Williams should be listed before him....older and cost more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...