Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

phillyb doing archaeology and poo in peru: a running photo blog for teh huddle


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

ok so today we took a break from the lab work and trekked out into the northern outskirts of the atacama desert, the world's driest, in search of a prospective site that had been supposed to have exhibited terracework, foundation and wall remains, and other such standards of archaeological features. the main goal, aside from locating the site, was to locate potsherds (the technical term for broken pottery shards) on the surface of the site to determine that it wasn't just an archaic pre-ceramic site (it still would've been cool, but not of interest to the empire/period we're studying, which was middle horizon (think about 600-1000 CE).

 

we drove out to the site, which, as i noted, is desolate as hell, and looks like this:

 

 

DSC04291_zpsa6e6f95b.jpg

 

 

 

 

it was a shitload of work. i ended up mapping the site once we found it (after hours of bouncing through endless desertscapes in a rattletrap of a 4x4 pickup) with a handheld GPS and spent an inordinate amount of time slogging up sandy dunes around the perimeter of the entire site, stopping every couple meters to log a waypoint into the interface to record the position. so most of my day looked like this:

 

 

 

 

DSC04332_zpsbfa1e99b.jpg

 

 

 

during the survey itself i located a large piece of pottery, one of the four we discovered, that provide solid evidence that it's a culture contemporary with ceramic use (and therefore with the empire we're studying) and gives merit to potential excavations there in the future. i photographed the potsherd in situ (a fancy archaeological term meaning in the context in which it was found; this generally applies during actual excavations when things are in their primary contexts, in houses, or storerooms, or trash pits, etc.) and we catalogued the profile and size.

 

 

 

 

DSC04320_zps21554934.jpg

 

 

 

 

i also came across (on a neighboring site several ridges over) this stone pathway, or what remains of it, leading to a ceremonial site. it was pretty nifty.

 

 

 

 

 

DSC04303_zpsd80086c3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am now even more convinced that the Mars rover images are fake as poo.

 

it's pretty wild. almost eerie, walking out there alone, with the wind absolutely howling and kicking up dust, surrounded by the mute remains of this ancient civilization, buildings just scattered down the desert dunes like they exploded, giant-ass boulders dropped in the middle of the sand like some god just threw them there

 

it's other-worldly

 

 

 

DSC04330_zpsc0bf45da.jpg

 

 

 

 

DSC04333_zps77f5947d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...