Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

<-------- See those social buttons? Please use them.


Zod

Recommended Posts

If you are interested in seeing the huddle continue to grow and gain access to the Panthers, you can do your bit by sharing it with friends.

 

The server is running and the lights are on in this joint because of you all, the huddlers, spreading the word.

 

May god have mercy on your souls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming clicking them will send the link of the current page or forum you're in to your social media page? So that you can post the link and accompany the link with something like "Hey, everyone check out the meltdown of panther nation after any loss this season"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming clicking them will send the link of the current page or forum you're in to your social media page? So that you can post the link and accompany the link with something like "Hey, everyone check out the meltdown of panther nation after any loss this season"

 

exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for all you slackers that view the huddle on your iPhone when you are supposed to he working, if you switch to the full version, a "share" toolbar magically appears at the bottom of the screen. It's a Christmas miracle!

Edit: it's actually on the mobile version too. I never noticed it until now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you counter the argument that the quality of message board / internet community follows a bell curve where once a certain size user base is surpassed the quality of content and discussion will inevitably deteriorate?  Do you have a suggestion/plan on how to combat that?

 

If the huddle (as with any message board) were to get super popular eventually the quality, respected, knowledgeable voices will be drowned out by the lowest common denominator (inane arguments and knee-jerk reactions).  Where the huddle lies on this curve currently is up for debate.  

 

As a user who does not stand to make any monetary gains from the huddles popularity, you probably understand my hesitance to make it as popular as can be.  I definitely don't think we are lacking in quality, dedicated users either.

 

So, convince me I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you counter the argument that the quality of message board / internet community follows a bell curve where once a certain size user base is surpassed the quality of content and discussion will inevitably deteriorate?  Do you have a suggestion/plan on how to combat that?

 

If the huddle (as with any message board) were to get super popular eventually the quality, respected, knowledgeable voices will be drowned out by the lowest common denominator (inane arguments and knee-jerk reactions).  Where the huddle lies on this curve currently is up for debate.  

 

As a user who does not stand to make any monetary gains from the huddles popularity, you probably understand my hesitance to make it as popular as can be.  I definitely don't think we are lacking in quality, dedicated users either.

 

So, convince me I'm wrong.

 

We already limit new topics to be done by those of 100 posts or more. We could always up that number.

 

Aside from that, only about 10 percent of people that visit this site log in and post. The rest are lurkers just wanting to read what is going on. They visit daily and have their favorite huddlers to follow. That is the vast majority of folks that would come here from the social sites.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if I click it and more ppl come then you'll take the new content feature away on opening day and it wont be back until after the season.

 

 

Those hamsters get tired the more people come around.

 

 

The only time the hamsters get tired are for the hour or so after a game is finished on game days. I am looking into some cloud servers that say they can alleviate such things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you counter the argument that the quality of message board / internet community follows a bell curve where once a certain size user base is surpassed the quality of content and discussion will inevitably deteriorate? Do you have a suggestion/plan on how to combat that?

If the huddle (as with any message board) were to get super popular eventually the quality, respected, knowledgeable voices will be drowned out by the lowest common denominator (inane arguments and knee-jerk reactions). Where the huddle lies on this curve currently is up for debate.

As a user who does not stand to make any monetary gains from the huddles popularity, you probably understand my hesitance to make it as popular as can be. I definitely don't think we are lacking in quality, dedicated users either.

So, convince me I'm wrong.

Sharing on social media sites won't make this site be the equivalent of a message board on the front page of ESPN. It WILL however bring in more panther fans, which will increase ad revenue, which could possibly lead to future goodies. I run a similar board with the same software and we have a chat room (which should work fine with this board as well). Obviously that function costs the owner additional money, which he'd need additional income to justify that cost. There are other similar goodies as well tha fit that scenario.

He would obviously have to increase moderators and modify the rules slightly if the forum were to become 3 or 4 times more popular.

Also for income,

He could get away with enhanced profiles, such as a bigger avatar, signature, vendor status, increased message box, no post count wait and other goodies by offering a premium account for a few dollars a month. (Believe it or not they sell)

I also was unsure why when I view the site on my computer the gray area to the left and right of the forum isn't being utilized. Why not fill it with ads and run Adsense with CPM? (Cost per 1000 impressions)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s been every bit as much of the problem as anyone else. You cant remove him from that fact, he is just as much part of the team and in THE most important position on the field. But this is the first season he’s seen any kind of continuity in his team and coaches. And he’s shown flashes here and there. But we do need more out of him going forward a lot more if we are going to be successful 
    • Bryce isn’t great and super mid. But I think can be a game manager. What do we think is out there? Daniel Jones isn’t going anywher. Mac Jones? Zach Wilson? Pickett. I’m just not sure what’s out there that is much better without having to give up a ton of capital. Rather take one more step closer to contention with our early rounders next year with FS and LB help. Make this  place where dang they got a defense and a WR1 and solid RB room. I can win with that and want to be here 
    • AR15 is if Justin Fields was fragile and his teammates hated him. No thanks. Ya'll think you hate watching Bryce Young? Wait until your QB can't even complete a 7 yard pass over the middle, which Fields and Richardson can't do. If the draft class was better, I could absolutely see the Titans moving on from Ward already if they got the #1 pick. But so far the college QB's haven't impressed enough. They'll have flashes, but then follow it up with a very meh game. Kyler is already done in Arizona, but he has a ridiculous contract and he's basically Bryce that likes to scramble, so no thanks. If Lawrence can't produce with that team in Jacksonville, what do you think he'll do here? He's tall Bryce who can throw deep but can't make the 4th down throws and crumbles in the red zone. No thanks. I do think Canales wants to move on from Bryce, his body language says so even in wins. He treated Bryce pretty odd this week and Bryce looked checked out in the Packers game. But unless they make another risky trade, its going to be slim pickings. Basically our hopes lie in hitting early in the draft with a Mateer, Nussmeier, Beck type or finding a random backup free agent that has another gear to hit.  I think even with the draft being wishy washy, 4-5 QB's will be taken in the top 7. A lot of teams are just that desperate.
×
×
  • Create New...