Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lumosity code for 30% off

Big A

By Big A,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Big A Newbie

Big A

Posted
Posted

Just signed up for Luminosity last week and my friend sent me a code for 30% off annual prescription, came out to about $4 a month of you pay year, $42 I think was exact amount. You can play some of the games for free without subscription, but you don't get all the stats, you don't get to compare yourself to rest of community, etc.

Also, of you want to share, it offered me to upgrade to a family account for like $5.30 or something close to that which allows access up to 5 accounts, so maybe you can slit cost with a few friends?

Just sharing, lots of science behind this site proving it works. Personally I have improved a decent amount in jet 6 days!

USE THIS CODE AT CHECKOUT ---> E30YTW1

http://www.lumosity.com

Lumosity is pushing the frontiers of neuroscience. Today, the brain-training startup revealed findings from its Human Cognition Project – an initiative that gives researchers access to its data to conduct experimental research.

Lumosity creates brain-training exercises designed to give your brain a workout. It turns strategies developed from academic research on cognition and neuroscience into games that can improve your ability to pay attention, remember information, and perform neurocognitive tasks — all of which are important to succeed in school, career, and life.

Since it launched in 2007, Lumosity has amassed the world’s largest and continuously growing dataset of human cognitive performance, including more than 40 million people who have been tracked for up to six years. It established the Human Cognition Project to expand the reach and impact of this data. The HCP is a global collaboration between researchers, neuroscientists, clinicians, teachers, and academics who mine this data to find insights. Over 1,500 scientists from around the world are using it to uncover insights about our how are brains work and various factors that influence cognitive function.

Read more at http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/20/lumosity-analyzes-brain-function-of-40m-people-to-push-neuroscience-forward/#CfR69Yf0C87Y0bYv.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Draft intel from ESPN’s Jordan Reid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
    • tukafan21
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I have no problem drafting a WR, even as high as the 2nd, but I do have an issue with using a precious 1st rounder on it. Another WR is a need, but we also have a lot of other needs, and the goal should always be to draft 1st rounders that you expect to be on the team for 10 years if they stay healthy. In regards to Coker, one of two things happen.  He keeps getting better and becomes our legit #2 to T-Mac and we have to pay him accordingly, or he doesn’t. If he does, then using that 1st rounder on a WR this year was dumb.  If he doesn’t, then drafting a WR in the 1st this year would be smart, but then so would trading Coker when his perceived value would be at its highest. If we were already had a SB contending roster, then yes, a 1st Round WR to put us over the top makes sense, but we just have too many holes to fill to use it that way… again, unless the staff just doesn’t believe in Coker’s ability to become a true #2, which I think he really can be.
×
×
  • Create New...