Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers D struggles against the Slant!


Pantherman

Recommended Posts

yes it was last year.. and could be this year...

first play....I thought to myself once I saw Norman out their. I bet Cutler is going to go right at him with a slant.....you know Cutler remembers tearing Norman up over and over to win that game.

First play was a slant on Norman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first play....I thought to myself once I saw Norman out their. I bet Cutler is going to go right at him with a slant.....you know Cutler remembers tearing Norman up over and over to win that game.

First play was a slant on Norman.

 

wasn't that first Norman int a slant? i could be wrong but i thought it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wasn't that first Norman int a slant? i could be wrong but i thought it was.

First play by Chicago was a slant.....on Norman. Which is what Cutler did that entire drive last year on him to win the game.

I give credit to Norman for capitalizing on a mistake. That actually is something toomany players don't do enough. Jeffries quit his slant though so it is hard to credit Norman with great coverage defending the slant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First play by Chicago was a slant.....on Norman. Which is what Cutler did that entire drive last year on him to win the game.

I give credit to Norman for capitalizing on a mistake. That actually is something toomany players don't do enough. Jeffries quit his slant though so it is hard to credit Norman with great coverage defending the slant.

 

gotcha i rewatched it on panthers.com. alshon did kind of quit on the route but Norman jumped it anyway.

 

it's something that needs to be worked on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

full speed game time with our front 4 breathing down your neck, corners giving just enough coverage to force the quick slant. and luke hanging out there picking them off.. im not worried.

if Luke is hanging out there.....he would be very out of position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...