Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Tolbert?


Recommended Posts

After hearing Tolbert's quote about "broken promises," anybody else also think he is vastly underutilized? I used to love watching him in SD when he averaged 600 rushing yards, 350 receiving yards, and 10 TD's.

 

As my favorite addition of 2012, he seemed to do nothing last year (except vulture goal line TD's). With the excitement surrounding Barner, I feel everyone is forgetting about the best complete FB in the NFL.

 

Every time he touches the rock it seems like he picks up a 1st down or TD. His pass-catching, durability, and blocking out of the backfield are second-to-none, but he seemed to disappear in the playbook for some reason. I know we have a crowded backfield already, but I love watching this bowling ball plow over defenses.

 

Here's to wishful thinking that he is actually implemented in the offensive playbook (not just kept to blocking and 1-yard rushes).     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you guys this..

He very much regrets leaving San Diego to come here. Not only did he take 1mil less, but we dont use him nearly as much as San Diego did. Now, we are going to a more traditional offense where he will be used as a tradition HB or FB, where he thought he was comming here to be some hybrid type player.

Not only do we underuse him, we underuse our entire backfield. Tolbert could be the starting HB in San Diego for a mil more. Ryan Mathews is a bust.

I love Tolbert though. Him, The Kraken, and Mr. Alexander came over amd signed my hat at the giants pre game last year. The only good thing that came my way that night, after emtying my bank accounts and starving the following month lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you guys this..

He very much regrets leaving San Diego to come here. Not only did he take 1mil less, but we dont use him nearly as much as San Diego did. Now, we are going to a more traditional offense where he will be used as a tradition HB or FB, where he thought he was comming here to be some hybrid type player.

Not only do we underuse him, we underuse our entire backfield. Tolbert could be the starting HB in San Diego for a mil more. Ryan Mathews is a bust.

I love Tolbert though. Him, The Kraken, and Mr. Alexander came over amd signed my hat at the giants pre game last year. The only good thing that came my way that night, after emtying my bank accounts and starving the following month lol

 

Agree 100%. He would definitely be the starting HB in SD. Taking a $1mil paycut I thought he would be a key part to our offense, so let's hope his "broken promises" quote holds true and he was just a victim of Chud's offense. Could be wishful thinking but I just don't understand why you wouldn't get him the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't t know that he was under utilized so much as utilized in a different way. Sure, he may not be the featured back he was at SD, but he still is an integral part of our offense. I don't think for a minute that the spotlight being shine on Barner diminishes in any way what MT brings to the table. Instead, I think Barner's moment in the sun is simply enthusiasm for a newcomer who shows promise as the next star in our RB pipeline. None of which makes Tolbert and his smash mouth play any less important to what this team wants to do. I think we'll take care of Mike just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...