Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why were there no designed roll outs for cam?


IGSaint

Recommended Posts

We all know how horrible our o-line is yet they called no roll outs for him and just let him drop back to get sacked or pressured. However as soon as clausen comes in he rolls out of the pocket for a pass. Does that make sense to anyone? Why did they call none for cam but for clausen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can logically deduce is that the coaching staff wants to see the offense winning basic football plays, even when the defense knows they're coming. The offense is vanilla but it's time for them to nut up and beat the guy across from them without any trickery. The 2nd and 3rd string offenses have utilized a broader playbook, probably because this is the only time they'll get to run them in live action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can logically deduce is that the coaching staff wants to see the offense winning basic football plays, even when the defense knows they're coming. The offense is vanilla but it's time for them to nut up and beat the guy across from them without any trickery. The 2nd and 3rd string offenses have utilized a broader playbook, probably because this is the only time they'll get to run them in live action.

 

This makes sense because goddamn the headache I would have if they are being idiots with the way they are trying to run the first string offense if it wasn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have won 2 games in 3 without giving the rest of the league any film on:

 

certain protection packages

2 TE sets

goal line sets

screens (there were a few)

roll outs and bootlegs

run-option

tosses and sweeps

runs outside the tackles, etc...

 

I know it hasn't been pretty.  And it is clear that we cannot be successful (at least in the short term) just running up the middle.

 

Which makes more sense: RR and Shula are oblivious and don't realize that the play calling has been ultra-vanilla, or that the are purposefully presenting the most basic formations without game planning?

 

I'm not saying they are geniuses and they have some serious issues with the power running game, but at least for now (since we are 2-1 and have beaten 2 playoff quality teams) let's assume there is a method to the madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only hope it is to hide much of what we are doing on offense for the regular season.

My gut tells me this is not the case though. I want to believe otherwise.

If they continue to run this offense in the regular season, that makes Shula and RR the dumbest people to every have NFL coaching jobs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they continue to run this offense in the regular season, that makes Shula and RR the dumbest people to every have NFL coaching jobs.

 

Well, to be fair, I already thought Shula was based on his past. You all kept telling me he is so much better now and has changed, so I remain hopeful you are right and that he is just holding his cards for the regular season.

 

I'm not ready to pass judgement on him yet, he may come out and light it up in week one. Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care if they run a high school triple option, do something impressive!

They have managed to make Barner look awful, a guy who just had a 1700 yard season. I almost cried when I saw Reggie Bush highlights from last night.

This better be the best decoy job since WW2 when they put a dead pilot somewhere off the coast of France with fake secret plans for the invasion of Europe effectively putting German reserves in the wrong areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...