Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Listen up Seattle! You are now ON NOTICE!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do want to know the win/loss record for 'On Notice' games... I tried to search but many threads have been lost over the years. I am not questioning Zod's integrity, I want to know..

Regardless, you cannot deny the articulated confidence, OnNotice gets this place pumped up. Thanks Zod...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going with 24-17 good guys as well.

How are you going to put up 24 points on our defense? Sorry, I don't see that happening, AT ALL.

The Legion of Boom will light up "Smitty" and out elite defense will be ready. It's to bad we don't have Percy, cause then we would probably put up 50 points. But, since we don't, and all our receivers could arguably be one of your #2's, I will predict a score of 38-13 Seahawks.

Of course, I will be back and eat crow otherwise.. but that's a 5% chance that we lose.

Go hawks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are you going to put up 24 points on our defense? Sorry, I don't see that happening, AT ALL.

The Legion of Boom will light up "Smitty" and out elite defense will be ready. It's to bad we don't have Percy, cause then we would probably put up 50 points. But, since we don't, and all our receivers could arguably be one of your #2's, I will predict a score of 38-13 Seahawks.

Of course, I will be back and eat crow otherwise.. but that's a 5% chance that we lose.

Go hawks!

Pssst... You haven't even seen your defense play under your new DC yet. Pipe down, junior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same goes for your OC.

 

We know that, thats why we aren't claiming a 38-7 victory like yourself.

 

 

Last time these teams played it was very close, and we are healthier and have improved more than seattle.

 

If I were you I would have more of a wait and see approach.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that, thats why we aren't claiming a 38-7 victory like yourself.

Last time these teams played it was very close, and we are healthier and have improved more than seattle.

If I were you I would have more of a wait and see approach.

Improved? Yeah, I suppose on the front seven. Looks pretty good, you guys have the right to be optimistic.

Just like how Seahawk fans have the right to be optimistic. We don't have a lot of weak spots on our team in the first place (O-line I guess, but we have two all pros there, so idk).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Improved? Yeah, I suppose on the front seven. Looks pretty good, you guys have the right to be optimistic.

Just like how Seahawk fans have the right to be optimistic. We don't have a lot of weak spots on our team in the first place (O-line I guess, but we have two all pros there, so idk).

 

The entire league has a season's worth of film on Russell Wilson now and will prepare accordingly. If he can't up his game, there is a sophomore slump in his future.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offense in '11 was 'elite' but was anything but last year. Change happens year to year.

Panthers could end with a better overall D than the Gayhawks

Come back around 430 on Sunday Sherman25 we'll have some Kleenex for you...actually, no we wont

Gayhawks? Clever. Gay slurs aren't cool, man. How will you have a better D? You guys don't even have a secondary as good as ours. We already have a really good front seven too.

You will be surprised, cats fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...