Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4th and inches


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

Guess we disagree. Bottom line is we lost with the way we did it. So it didn't work. We will never know what would have happened had we gone for it there :- We needed momentum on offense and failed to get any in the second half. That could have been the spark. Like I said. We will never know. Tired of losing seasons. I hope we win next week.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

We got the ball back...

Offense was marching down field....all the way to the Seattle 10. We had momentum. Then we fumbled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt see you post stats either smart ass

 

I know very few coaches go for it on fourth except in desperate situations, and anyone with an even halfway decent knowledge of the NFL can tell you that.

 

I also know from reading your posts that you don't know much about situational football.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know very few coaches go for it on fourth except in desperate situations, and anyone with an even halfway decent knowledge of the NFL can tell you that.

 

I also know from reading your posts that you don't know much about situational football.

 

 

Hey some love to play it safe and some have the balls to take the risks that can win or lose you games.. maybe I am just tired of the same ol same ol with this team and would love to see some risks being taken.. sue me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey some love to play it safe and some have the balls to take the risks that can win or lose you games.. maybe I am just tired of the same ol same ol with this team and would love to see some risks being taken.. sue me.

 

Going for it on fourth and inches in your own territory when you have only a slim lead and your defense has been playing well, isn't a presence of balls, its a lack of brains.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going for it on fourth and inches in your own territory when you have only a slim lead and your defense has been playing well, isn't a presence of balls, its a lack of brains.

 

 

Didn't Bill Belichick go for it on 4th and 2 in his own territory, with the lead, against Peyton Manning a few years ago. I doubt Belichick lacks any brains

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Bill Belichick go for it on 4th and 2 in his own territory, with the lead, against Peyton Manning a few years ago. I doubt Belichick lacks any brains

 

Lost him the game too.  That was a stupid call also, but to be fair Manning had already hung 14 points in the 4th quarter against them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Bill Belichick go for it on 4th and 2 in his own territory, with the lead, against Peyton Manning a few years ago. I doubt Belichick lacks any brains

 

Remind me.  Who won that game?

 

 

What irony?? please enlightmen me mr.football

 

And again... :rolleyes:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Bill Belichick go for it on 4th and 2 in his own territory, with the lead, against Peyton Manning a few years ago. I doubt Belichick lacks any brains

 

He did this often in his career in NE and I believe without looking up stats that its' been more of a success % than a failure % for his team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remind me.  Who won that game?

 

 

 

And again... :rolleyes:

 

 

Scot, I think Toolbox is some kid that just discovered Football and thinks he knows it all, it's the only thing I can figure for him.

 

Or he's thinking as the saying goes: if you ever dig a hole too deep sometimes its better to just keep digging then to admit the mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...