Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I liked the offense and I'm confident moving forward.


Awesomeness!!

Recommended Posts

I know 7 points isn't a lot to cheer about but Seattle has a decent defense and we did move the ball well on most drives. We made a ton of mistakes that otherwise would have lead to an easy W. Olsen's drop, Cams overthrow of Lafell, D Will's fumble etc. I liked the way the offense moved. It was slow and methodical, similar to what we ran in the Super Bowl year. I understand everybody wants to spread the ball out and throw 60 times but that has never been what we did here, and that high school ish offense is a fad, just like how 5 years ago you needed a feature running back, and how 10 years ago if you didn't have a TE, or running QB you had no shot. That being said if we don't beat the Bills Ron Rivera had better be unemployed after double zero's because there is no reason for losing to them. None, what so ever. There is no excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt your post gets much traction other than people bashing you so I thought I would throw this up just to add a little support to your claim.

 

"Longform
...If anything, Carolina looked better than expected in a few key areas. Cam Newton, a lousy red zone passer in his career, converted a third down inside the 20 and finished the drive with a touchdown pass. And the secondary held up well, save for a pair of back-to-back plays in the second half (Jermaine Kearse’s go-ahead touchdown, and the play right before it when Stephen Williams got open deep but dropped a pass) when Seattle receivers got behind their man down the right sideline. If anything, I’m more convinced now that this team can win the division."
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd be a lot more worried if we scored seven points because we couldn't move the ball. olsen's dropsies and williams's fumbles can be fixed.

 

i'm an eternal optimist but i think we come out with a smart gameplan next week and look outstanding on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem wasn't Cam Newton. The problem was the play calling and the lack of execution by the WRs (not named Steve Smith), TEs (greg Olsen dropping not one but two balls, and the RBs (Deangelo Williams fumbling the ball on the 6 yard line). Cam was efficent and ran the plays that were given to him. He didn't overthrow receivers, he didn't throw interceptions, and he didn't fumble the ball. Our 2nd and 3rd WRs need to do a better job of getting seperation and catching the balls thrown to them. Also, Shula needs to throw a few deep balls each game. Maybe he didn't against Seattle because of their secondary, but that is Cam's best asset, the deep ball. So, if you eliminate that, you are greatly stifling your offense, imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. The offense was sufficient to win the game. Olsen's drops and Williams' fumble really cost us. The one thing I'd like to see more is dump offs and screens to Tolbert. He is much better in space than he is getting hand offs from the fullback position.  

 

only scored once. that's not sufficient to win the game, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were in position to win though. How many times do you expect us to score? This isn't college. We played well enough on offense and defense to win, but made too many mistakes. It happens.

 

Every other team so far this season except for Jacksonville managed to score more than 7 points. Against a defense missing a lot of key players that had to fly across the country, we managed to score a whopping 7 points at home with Cam Newton at quarterback. If you're satisfied with that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were in position to win though. How many times do you expect us to score? This isn't college. We played well enough on offense and defense to win, but made too many mistakes. It happens.

 

i expected us to score more than one TD. i expected us to not be the second lowest scoring team of the week. 23 teams managed to score enough points for us to have won.

 

let's not play this "it's hard to score enough points to beat a team that was only able to score 12" game. teams apparently do it quite often. it was a very weak offensive outing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many here are living in dreamland when they say we would have won that game if Williams had not fumbled.

 

The score would have been 14-12 if we converted the TD and ExP.

 

Look at what happened in reality. 5 minutes left, Seattle with the ball on their on 8 yrd line. We disparately needed the ball back. Seattle, even with the lead, systematically took the ball down the field and could have scored a field goal or TD on that last drive if they had needed to..

 

No way Dwill's fumble lost that game. Playing close to the vest lost that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course we would like to score 555455485742 points every game but thats not going to happen. It was a defensive struggle and even with that being the case I liked what we did. We were in position to win. Thats all you can really ask for. Our players (Dwill) didn't execute, The gameplan was fine though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Every team does it's homework. More so than any fan.  Brooks, had he not been injured, would have been a first round talent.  I have zero problems with the team (Dan Morgan and company) drafting Brooks in the 2nd.  He is a fantastic talent.  As far as risk, this is the NFL.  Any and every player is exposed to the same brutality that the NFL is.  Despite Brooks latest setback, it doesn't cost the team much.  Our running back room is stacked.  Could they have drafted someone else? Sure. No promise that someone else would have made an impact last year.  Or this year.   When it's your job to do what Dan does, I pray you get it all right. Lord knows that there isn't a single GM that gets it all right.   
    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
×
×
  • Create New...