Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those who say our game plan didn't work


MuMouey

Recommended Posts

I see where the negative nancies are coming from, but its really played out and tiresome. Bitching about the game and loss is not a good reason to log onto the huddle for me. I like to come here with a positive outlook for my own sanity and more importantly discuss the actions that led to a loss or W with an objective point of view and not slam any one player or coach because of a previous agenda I have had with them.

I just think its pointless for others to drop their lil one liner snide remarks because we lost, no fuging poo we lost... I wish they would get over it and not get in the way of people trying to have a decent discussion.

 

This an excellent post.  That is why I look at some of these dudes with thousands of posts and I see them in every thread leaving one to five word quips trying to be funny.  It starts from the top down though and many times they get pie for the mularkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This an excellent post.  That is why I look at some of these dudes with thousands of posts and I see them in every thread leaving one to five word quips trying to be funny.  It starts from the top down though and many times they get pie for the mularkey.

You just joined last year, you're not allowed to criticize our five word posts yet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is like Zod said, any game plan that depends on 100% execution success to eek out a win isn't a very good game plan.  A game with close to 100% execution success should equal a win in pretty dominate fashion in almost every instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in short, this thread is pretty much about repeating what RR said in the press conference? (players need to execute)

 

 

Well hell...I'm gonna pie that for no other reason than because it hasnt been said 1,000 times before across the seasons.

 

it was more for educating the stupid via pictures and hard facts cuz that's what they seem to lack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is like Zod said, any game plan that depends on 100% execution success to eek out a win isn't a very good game plan.  A game with close to 100% execution success should equal a win in pretty dominate fashion in almost every instance.

 

I suggest following suit with everyone else and not wasting any more time trying to explain this to someone who clearly lacks the mental capacity to process it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s wild to me that so many of you guys are threatened by the idea of an opposing team fan who is polite in 2025. He’s been posting here on and off for years, usually when our teams play each other which hasn’t been for a while. I’d maybe understand this treatment if it was a falcons or saints fan, but packers fans in general are one of the nicer fan bases as long as you aren’t another NFC north team (especially the bears).   
    • Some players excel on the big stage, while others freeze and succumb to the pressure. I’m not convinced Cam took a dive. I think he didn’t handle the stage very well. The pressure got to him and he folded. He wouldn’t be the first quarterback or player to struggle in a Super Bowl. Two HOF examples - John Elway and Jim Kelly. The 2002 MVP, Rich Gannon, threw 5 interceptions against the Bucs. Poor performances happen.  Unless of course you believe all these players threw the games they played in, but if that occurred, surely someone by now would have admitted taking a dive? 🤷‍♂️
    • It was always a matter of time with Cam’s playing style and a shorter shelf life than passers that protect themselves. I suppose Cam could have still been playing in 2028 ten years after the hit took place, but he would need to have evolved as a quarterback and become more of a passer than the dual threat maestro he was. It’s sad because it makes us think of what could have been, but I do feel it was always a matter of time until all the hits took their toll.
×
×
  • Create New...