Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's your verdict?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I'm leaning about 60% on we played well anchored by a dominant defensive front facing a bad offensive line and an offense more tailored for Cam's talents against an average Giants-D.  It felt good but we're 1-2.  Still need to keep pounding (the Giants are struggling mightily in the trenches)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry. couldn't help it.

 

tbh, tho, jury is still out. until proven otherwise, this game is an anomaly...an abberation. i'm just not a believer that what we saw today is what we can expect later.

 

the giants are really bad right now, tho. that team is a mess. it was like watching us from the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did we really play that well or are the Giants just that bad?

(for the sake of discussion, 'both' isn't allowed as a response; pick one)

I have my own podcast that I've been doing for the last year and a half. I've said for the last couple weeks that the Giants just aren't that good.

Now after saying that, in my watching of how the panthers and giants played and lost I said that the Giants matchup was in their favor. Meaning, the giants appeared that they could slow our rush in order to carve up the secondary.

Our LBs would have to cover the pass too much to help stop the run or rush the passer.

On offense the panthers line could not protect against the Giants front 4 with cam dropping back and passing.

The only caveat that I offered as the only way the cats could win this thing was to get constant pressure by the front 4 and to take the blinders off of our best player, Cam.

My Caveat was the deciding factor. We flipped the tables on the giants. We nullified their strengths and capitalized on their weaknesses. This is what good teams do.

The giants are not Super Bowl contenders but they are far from being garbage. The panthers executed in a way that I did not think, and that they had not shown they could do.

Long answer short, the Panthers completely dismantled a competent and worthy opponent. Rejoice this is the statement victory we have been yearning for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw what the hell happened to the Giants? How did they get so terrible so fast? The only key player they really lost was Osi. Eli is still QB, same coaching staff, this is pretty much the same team that won a SB a couple years back. What happened exactly? Its like they come out of nowhere and all of a sudden they are the Jaguars 2.0 for no apparent reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...