Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

can we talk about sports betting here?


toldozer

Recommended Posts

I like to have action on a big game but I don't bet much because I am not a very good handicapper.

 

I like NE +2 at ATL

and

ARI + 2.5 at TB

 

OK gotthose two and added another bet on Everton (over 2.5) today.

 

Would love to have some action on the MNF game tonight but nothing strikes me on the line (-7) or over (49.5). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just started back on Saturday. 4-1-1 atm. I don't go crazy with a bunch of games. Just played two premier league games. The Georgia game (push) and a couple NFL prop bets. I really like us minus one Sunday, but never go for or against us. Anyone have a must play for college football this Saturday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May have to look into the soccer thing.  I went against my gut and bet on us last weekend.  The numbers were about 70% in our favor as a road favorite of less than a TD coming off a bye.  The numbers didn't account for Chico's abysmal post bye record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May have to look into the soccer thing. I went against my gut and bet on us last weekend. The numbers were about 70% in our favor as a road favorite of less than a TD coming off a bye. The numbers didn't account for Chico's abysmal post bye record.

I find it much easier to bet on over/under overall. Like yesterday I was pretty sure Bears would win, but I was more positive the over would hit, which it did. It's basically trying to figure if there is going to be a low scoring defensive type game, or a decent scoring to shootout type game. Now this is just for football, the over unders on basketball are a lot harder for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...