Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we go after Gonzalez?


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

The guy made a decision to return to the NFL, to win a championship. Even though things aren't going well in Atlanta, I'd be pissed if I was him and you shipped me to the 1-3 Panthers! Let's get real. I can see him in New England. They need help but still have a solid foundation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just thinking to myself New England would be perfect. I think Gonzalez and Gronkowski would be better than Gronk and Hernandez

The guy made a decision to return to the NFL, to win a championship. Even though things aren't going well in Atlanta, I'd be pissed if I was him and you shipped me to the 1-3 Panthers! Let's get real. I can see him in New England. They need help but still have a solid foundation. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest KingKam

The point was Atlanta was trying to do him a favor for choosing to comeback in hope of getting a superbowl. So they want to 'trade' him to a team that have a high chance of playing in the superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point was Atlanta was trying to do him a favor for choosing to comeback in hope of getting a superbowl. So they want to 'trade' him to a team that have a high chance of playing in the superbowl.

So the panthers, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
    • Give me Blake on the 3rd  
×
×
  • Create New...