Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My pregnant wife and I almost got ran over by neighbors teenage kid


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

there's this invention called a sidewalk

don't walk in the street and then complain when a car almost hits you

Here are the NC pedestrian laws:

http://www.ncdot.gov/bikeped/download/bikeped_laws_ped_laws.pdf

Bottom of page 6 continuing to page 7 says you can't walk on street when sidewalk is present and you also can't stand where it impedes flow of traffic, even at crosswalk. So legally, the pedestrians seem to be committing a class 2 misdemeanor, and thus the car's driver can dispute the reason for partial loss of control was due to pedestrians obstructing flow of traffic. Just giving a legal perspective, not excusing the young guys irresponsible behavior, especially if you say he does it all the time. Letting the office know was right way to proceed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spider Monkey

An accurate comparison would be to walk in the middle of a shooting range and then complain when I catch a stray bullet.

Wrong. You are more likely to get shot at a store than a shooting range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. Sales rep will do nothing in this situation.

 

Is there a facebook page for the neighborhood?  If so, just ask everyone to be cautious, that you almost got hit yesterday, and for folks to be on the lookout, and be careful.

 

If there is not a page, start one, and ask everyone to "like" it so you can all be in touch with each other.

 

Going to the parents will do very little as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the NC pedestrian laws:

http://www.ncdot.gov/bikeped/download/bikeped_laws_ped_laws.pdf

Bottom of page 6 continuing to page 7 says you can't walk on street when sidewalk is present and you also can't stand where it impedes flow of traffic, even at crosswalk. So legally, the pedestrians seem to be committing a class 2 misdemeanor, and thus the car's driver can dispute the reason for partial loss of control was due to pedestrians obstructing flow of traffic. Just giving a legal perspective, not excusing the young guys irresponsible behavior, especially if you say he does it all the time. Letting the office know was right way to proceed.

 

you must get all the chicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...