Please Lose the Read Option

[toldozer]

I'd like to see more triple option

I agree, tolbert up the middle with cam able to pull then Williams flanking for the pitch. Once a game is good though. For the love of God no more wildcat though!!!!! Unless we've been setting up a Williams pass for six years and through two coaching Staffs.

[Disinfranchised]

Your ***OFFICIAL "FAIL POST OF THE WEEK" NOMINEE*** right here folks!!!!!

 

Thanks for the interesting comment.

[nosuchthingasapanther]

This play.

Works only once in 2 games. IMO, takes away the offensive advantage of knowing where the ball is going. Yea, the other teams have to prepair and they do. I think this was the last time it worked well.

when was the last time it was used?

it isn't used as much as one might think to warrant a thread complaining about it.

[Disinfranchised]

when was the last time it was used?

it isn't used as much as one might think to warrant a thread complaining about it.

 

2 or 3 times a game.  Too much for a basically non productive play. I know it was used last week.

[nosuchthingasapanther]

2 or 3 times a game. Too much for a basically non productive play. I know it was used last week.

so out of the 66 plays carolina averages per game this season, using the read option 2-3x per game is too much?

[nosuchthingasapanther]

ultimately, the read option isn't the problem.

it's the sucktastic manner in which carolina executes it that needs to go away.

[Growl]

Thanks for the interesting comment.

 

Thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid thread and another legitimately strong argument for those of is who believe the thread starting post requirement should be raised.

[Guild]

Thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid thread and another legitimately strong argument for those of is who believe the thread starting post requirement should be raised.

 

Post count requirements only affect people who come to the board for a short time to troll the users.  It does not affect people who regularly come to the board to create bad posts (like me) or bad threads (like longtriad).

 

Just look, I have over 6,000 posts and contribute virtually nothing.  Is this an argument to raise the post count requirement to 7,000? or 10,000?  I think not.

[Growl]

Post count requirements only affect people who come to the board for a short time to troll the users.  It does not affect people who regularly come to the board to create bad posts (like me) or bad threads (like longtriad).

 

my apologies what I meant to infer is that the post count requirement should be raised to one above whatever longtriad's current post count is at any given moment

[Guild]

my apologies what I meant to infer is that the post count requirement should be raised to one above whatever longtriad's current post count is at any given moment

Haha have some pie :)

[Fan01]

In my opinion the Read Option is something that wakes Cam up.  It gets him going.  With Cam skills as a runner and our Running backs we'd be stupid to NEVER run it.  Any play in the NFL when overused is asking for trouble.

 

 

[Delhommey]

Let's get rid of the ISO. It usually produces no more than 2-3 yards and is a waste of a down.

Am I doing it right?

[Disinfranchised]

so out of the 66 plays carolina averages per game this season, using the read option 2-3x per game is too much?

 

Just watched the first half of last weeks ame. At least 4 times.  Yes, 1 time is too many for a nonproductive play. Just my opinion.  Obviously, the coaches aint getting it either, so don't worry, they'll still keep running it.

[Disinfranchised]

Thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid thread and another legitimately strong argument for those of is who believe the thread starting post requirement should be raised.

 

New threads shouldONLY be for expurts like YOU!  Sorry.  No more for me.