Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shula: Finally getting it?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

What a difference a month makes! As one who has been highly critical of Mike Shula, the past three games have given me pause. Perhaps I was a bit premature in my assessment of his inability to design effective plays, and manage a game.  His play calling no longer reminds me of watching the same rerun over and over during the game, much less multiple games in a row.  I don't know about you, but the play where Smitty basically took Revis out the play while Ginn came across underneath (and Cam hit him in stride) was a thing of beauty.  Perhaps he just needs more time (just like Rivera, Cam and the rest of the team) to develop, or gel (if you will) with the personnel, as the OC. He's learning the potential of all his pieces---in part, and as a whole ("playing chess instead of checkers"). I want to see how he handles his duties when we get to the "meat" of our schedule, and whether or not his game plan adapts to the game under tough conditions, but I am encouraged from what I've seen as of late. His "situational awareness" (as well as Rivera's and Cam's, seems to be improving with each week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Shula has done a great job the whole season. I didn't remember him from his Tampa days so I had no bias for or against him. I think a lot you were brainwashed by Zod but Shula has done a terrific job all season. No he hasn't been perfect in every game but I really like what I have seen from him so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula has only called one bad game, which was the Bills game. He totally abandoned the run, which is what really did us in.

 

Let's be honest, we all passed out grades on Shula before the season even started, kinda like the Ginn thread, where some of you are claiming he drops to many passes, when the actually truth is, the deep ball last night was his first drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a difference a month makes! As one who has been highly critical of Mike Shula, the past three games have given me pause. Perhaps I was a bit premature in my assessment of his inability to design effective plays, and manage a game.  His play calling no longer reminds me of watching the same rerun over and over during the game, much less multiple games in a row.  I don't know about you, but the play where Smitty basically took Revis out the play while Ginn came across underneath (and Cam hit him in stride) was a thing of beauty.  Perhaps he just needs more time (just like Rivera, Cam and the rest of the team) to develop, or gel (if you will) with the personnel, as the OC. He's learning the potential of all his pieces---in part, and as a whole ("playing chess instead of checkers"). I want to see how he handles his duties when we get to the "meat" of our schedule, and whether or not his game plan adapts to the game under tough conditions, but I am encouraged from what I've seen as of late. His "situational awareness" (as well as Rivera's and Cam's, seems to be improving with each week. 

 

I think Shula has always got it. Everyone especially Cam have said that it's preparation and execution. There hasn't been a major change as far as philosophy.  The team just wasn't executing properly.  A lot of people were predetermined that Shula sucks and were conditioned to see the bad over the good  We all are guilty of it. 

 

From Ron Rivera is going to make a bad decision to Deangelo Williams isn't a good running back to Cam needs to be traded.  Preconceived notions are hard to discard.  Especially when you care about the team and realize we wouldn't have lost a game this year if we have played like this the whole time.

 

I rewatch all the games on NFL rewind and have never seen a play that was just a "bad" call.  I have seen lots of bad results, but not really bad calls.  Running plays on 3 and 1 that are working now are the same running plays as before except for the fact that someone didn't miss a block.   Passing plays that were thrown high or picked off before are now between the numbers and blocking (especially pass blocking) has been much improved.  Shula was never a problem,  Cam, Oline, WR/TE dropping balls, bad route running were the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, executing.

That is players.

Shula called a a comparable game against Seattle as his recent praised ones. Fans were just in shock we weren't attempting bombs all game.

Fans asked for the Bills debacle......Shula/Cam simply weren't back to the Seattle game model and we are rolling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Shula has always got it. Everyone especially Cam have said that it's preparation and execution. There hasn't been a major change as far as philosophy.  The team just wasn't executing properly.  A lot of people were predetermined that Shula sucks and were conditioned to see the bad over the good  We all are guilty of it. 

 

From Ron Rivera is going to make a bad decision to Deangelo Williams isn't a good running back to Cam needs to be traded.  Preconceived notions are hard to discard.  Especially when you care about the team and realize we wouldn't have lost a game this year if we have played like this the whole time.

 

I rewatch all the games on NFL rewind and have never seen a play that was just a "bad" call.  I have seen lots of bad results, but not really bad calls.  Running plays on 3 and 1 that are working now are the same running plays as before except for the fact that someone didn't miss a block.   Passing plays that were thrown high or picked off before are now between the numbers and blocking (especially pass blocking) has been much improved.  Shula was never a problem,  Cam, Oline, WR/TE dropping balls, bad route running were the problem.

 

I will defer to your thought process, in general, because you have re-watched the games, but I remember some bad play calls (like unnecessarily running the Wild Cat), and running D-will (or Tolbert) into the middle of a pile repetitively. And let's not forget the god-awfully slow developing read option that was reminiscent of the first part of last year (granted, this may have been solely Cam's problem, but I doubt it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is players.

Shula called a a comparable game against Seattle as his recent praised ones. Fans were just in shock we weren't attempting bombs all game.

Fans asked for the Bills debacle......Shula/Cam simply weren't back to the Seattle game model and we are rolling

yea i meant the main difference is the players are putting it all together now.  the scheme and play calling is very similar, he just knows our strengths and weaknesses a little better.  people here find it much easier and bearable to blame coaches because they are easier to replace than the players, therefore instead of admitting we were playing with deficiencies, folks just ignorantly pointed the finger at Shula because it is so easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...