Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Domenik Hixon?


Bloodflood

Recommended Posts

Considering that a good amount of our offense is run out of a 2 TE and/or 2 RB set with a healthy running game and that WRs 1-3 are productive, I see no reason that a 4th WR would see significant non-ST time on the field. Your assertion that not running 5 WR on the field means you're not running a productive passing game is ridiculous.

You just took what I said and ran a totally different direction lol.

I never said not running a 5 wide isn't productive, I'm saying why not try it out a couple of time if the most elite QB's and offenses run it frequently?

What would possibly be wrong with trying out a couple 5 wide sets and seeing what Hixon/McNutt/King can really do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just took what I said and ran a totally different direction lol.

I never said not running a 5 wide isn't productive, I'm saying why not try it out a couple of time if the most elite QB's and offenses run it frequently?

What would possibly be wrong with trying out a couple 5 wide sets and seeing what Hixon/McNutt/King can really do?

 

Good clarification, as your point above was very ambiguous and did imply that 5 WR sets were required to be a succesful pasing team.  My thought is, why bother?  Olsen is better than Hixon/McNutt/King and having a back/TE on the field has been key to helping our line pass protect effectively.  I just don't really see what the benefit of going 5 WR is based on the other personnel on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera said that Cam Newtons best runs come from when he's just naturally scrambling. Mostly because all the receivers have just finished running their routes 15 yards down the field and the DB's have their backs turned.

Imagine a 5 wide set, 5 options for Cam, and if nobody is open he takes off for a gain of 15+. It's an absolute win-win situation.

I also wanna see what some of these younger wide outs got. Teams all over the league are finding young deep threats with potential by giving them an opportunity in a base 5 wide package.

There's no way this could harm or affect anything, so why not try it out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheap jersey and very nice quality NFL Jersey just need $18.99
Order 10 pcs jerseys we provide free shipping.
Drenched Limited Version Jerseys Available Now
NFL Nlike Drift Fashion II Elite Jersey in Stock
Share our site on Facebook you can get the 5% discount code!~
We also have the customized jersey service and you can have the jersey stitched on you name and your number!
Enjoy the best online shipping experience

 

i like to eat rappit poo out of a box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheap jersey and very nice quality NFL Jersey just need $18.99

Order 10 pcs jerseys we provide free shipping.

Drenched Limited Version Jerseys Available Now

NFL Nlike Drift Fashion II Elite Jersey in Stock

Share our site on Facebook you can get the 5% discount code!~

We also have the customized jersey service and you can have the jersey stitched on you name and your number!

Enjoy the best online shipping experience

 

 

What he said.

 

/thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...