Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snapchat turns down $3B offer fron FBook


Kitten Diver

Recommended Posts

As a 20 year old at a large educational institution (UT Austin), I can say that this app is WIDELY used. It's not only for titty/dick pics, but many people do use it for that purpose. It's just like any other "modern" iOS social media app, like instagram and vine. It was a clever idea, but I mean, it's just a flash in the pan. I don't think the app is sustainable enough to generate more profit in, let's say, 5 years. 

 

All you old geezers are fascinated with social media and titty pics hahaha

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shoulda taken the $3Billion.

 

Technologies like this are fad-esque and as soon as it is deemed not cool....its done for

 

Also trying to think of a business use for it. Facebook wants it because it has a huge demographic that facebook has admittingly been losing. teens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was pretty dumb to pass up this.  3 BILLION dollars?  His family for generations would be set.  You could take that money and create something else, and this time not worry about loans or anything.   It is true, technology comes and goes, you make money when you can and run.  Look at MySpace and how quickly its value fell?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an insane amount of money, they should've taken it.

 

I heard that fb had offered them like $1B last year... maybe they're waiting for more... I have a concept of what you can do with $3B.  Maybe they don't...

 

Exactly.  My concept is not having to work ever again, swimming in 100 dollar bills, getting a fruit punch fountain in your room like Mr. Deeds, seeing any sporting event you want, etc.

 

Greed may turn out bad for this guy.  We'll see though.  I mean how much isn't enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...