Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The most complete game of the year....


Zaximus

Recommended Posts

Was played today.

Cutler was carving us up in the first, but we adjusted and shut him down. Our run game was great, Jake was good, he was finding Smith (obviously), Moose, and even some looks to King and Jarrett (albeit some iffy throws, but still, he's scanning a bit). Defense stepped it up, we got tons of pressure on the "impenetrable o-line." Peppers was held by the rookie all day, but no calls. Brayton/Johnson are a great tandem for DE, and luckily our secondary picked it up. Godfrey had some mess ups but made up for it too.

If we play like this from now on we'll be tough to beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we played very well today and a good game plan by the coaches was probably a big factor for us. I was shocked when we came out slinging the ball around...happy(especially considering how well Delhomme played), but shocked. Denver's run defense hasn't been very good all year long, so I really expected a paint by numbers type of gameplan from Foxy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i' think the most complete game this year was the Saints game earlier (no passing TDs let up to the #1 passing team), then this game, then the chiefs game (don't forget we had 2 turnovers in that game) then the bucs game (2 turnovers and our D was torched at times with huge plays)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF...our run game was straight up bad IMO...take away the 60 yard gain from Williams and it was like every play was for 2 or 3 yards.

you can't "take away" a 56 yard TD run.

they had a linebacker playing safety and played the run the whole game. just the threat of the running game changed their whole gameplan, and it cost them dearly.

:lol: at their other safety playing 30 yards deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF...our run game was straight up bad IMO...take away the 60 yard gain from Williams and it was like every play was for 2 or 3 yards.

They played a 4-4 all game with that LB as a S. Great if you want to stop the run but if the other team can throw the ball your gonna get eaten alive. They also put Moose one-on-one all game. The mark of a good team is when someone take away your bread and butter you kill them with the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...