Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers examine panthers schedule


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

:incazzato:

The 49ers looked at the Panthers' 2009 schedule and were struck by its on-paper difficulty. After all, the Panthers have road games against the Falcons, Cowboys, Buccaneers, Cardinals, Saints, Patriots and Giants. It'll be extremely difficult for the Panthers to come close to matching their 12-4 record of 2008. Niners fans will be rooting against the Panthers this season.

http://blog.pressdemocrat.com/49ers/2009/07/weakness-in-09-will-determine-how-49ers-spend-first-round-picks.html

The 49ers reportedly had their eyes on a potentially rich 2010 quarterback class when they traded their 2009 second-round pick for the Panthers' first-rounder next year.

This might seem idiotic when you consider Carolina went 12-4 last year, lost little key personnel, and seems unlikely to provide a high 2010 pick. But the 49ers reportedly examined the Panthers' 2009 schedule and deemed it very difficult. San Fran could also trade up with two first-round picks. Sam Bradford (Oklahoma) and Jevan Snead (Ole Miss) are the top QB prospects for 2010

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=5161

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it very hard to believe, no matter how hard our schedule, that San Fran will get a top 20 pick from us. Besides a bunch of shitty injuries (which I guess we all know is more than possible), I dont see us going worse than 9-7. I think that we go 12-4 again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they do have a vested interest in trying to think we'll suck since they have our 1st round pick. Can't blame them for thinking homeristic thoughts...

Wouldn't think anything less than that being the case... Turn the tables and I would be hoping the 49ers lose every game. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they do have a vested interest in trying to think we'll suck since they have our 1st round pick. Can't blame them for thinking homeristic thoughts...

true...i would do the same thing..but its funny to me that everybody is counting us out before the season even starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they do have a vested interest in trying to think we'll suck since they have our 1st round pick. Can't blame them for thinking homeristic thoughts...

Oh, homeristic thoughts. I thought that was something else at first. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...