Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers camp countdown Defensive line critical


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

A nice synopsis of where the team stands and what directions it needs to be headed in. I particularly like the mention of the secondary and how if that line solidifys then the defense will be, as an all-around unit, fearsome. If opposing scouts can see that and be worried then we as fans should see that and be optomistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, SC pantherfan wrote that thread to be responded to, but you just insured it wouldn't be. Why? What the hell is your motivation?...

My motivation was to respond to this very article that SC pantherfan was kind enough to post. The article which further backs up everything that I have been telling people all along. I guess certain people just hate it when Gman is right. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My motivation was to respond to this very article that SC pantherfan was kind enough to post. The article which further backs up everything that I have been telling people all along. I guess certain people just hate it when Gman is right. ;)

Well, considering that no one has ever denied what the quote that you pointed out was saying I can't quite see how you being right is any more special than anything else that anyone has said. Where there is a discrepincy between what you say and what most others believe is that Meeks' will put emphasis on different areas of play, such as speed and ball stripping, and will more than likely be more willing to step out of the box than Turgovac ever was. The quote that you posted, while accurate, does nothing to back up anything you've ever said.

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, considering that no one has ever denied what the quote that you pointed out was saying I can't quite see how you being right is any more special than anything else that anyone has said. Where there is a discrepincy between what you say and what most others believe is that Meeks' will put emphasis on different areas of play, such as speed and ball stripping, and will more than likely be more willing to step out of the box than Turgovac ever was. The quote that you posted, while accurate, does nothing to back up anything you've ever said.

Try again.

People keep saying that scheme is totally different now and that it is going to drastically change. The article points out the very opposite which is what Ive been saying. Im pretty sure every defenses goal is to get to "run to the ball" and make a play. Ill beleive there will be change when I see it. Im just tired of buying the hype every year only to see the same exact thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some valid points yet other parts are so untrue it makes it hard to give much credence to the article. Look at the Meeks versus Trgovac argument. I am no expert but Trgovac always had the most complex plays with lots of assignments. He always talked about simplifying things but the complaint was that his defenses were easy to beat but hard to execute. Then Meeks comes in and runs a simplified scheme which emphasizes speed instead of strength. Seems they aren't similar but that Meeks is doing what Trgovac couldn't. Simplify things and capitalize on the players strengths instead of trying to fit the players into specific roles and complex read and react schemes. Hardly similar from what I can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying that scheme is totally different now and that it is going to drastically change. The article points out the very opposite which is what Ive been saying. Im pretty sure every defenses goal is to get to "run to the ball" and make a play. Ill beleive there will be change when I see it. Im just tired of buying the hype every year only to see the same exact thing.

Seriously?

The article itself contradicts itself on your grand point..

Defense: Meeks is a product of the Tony Dungy school of defense, so look for him to play a lot of cover-2 zones and emphasize speed and mobility over size and strength. Meeks won't lean on the blitz but will look to pressure the quarterback with his front four linemen. The back seven will be asked to limit big plays by keeping the ball in front of them, but the safeties will do a lot of filling in the run game. Meeks' approach isn't much different from the one employed by predecessor Mike Trgovac.

Trgo ran mostly a Cover 3 while the article points out Meeks will have more of a Cover 2..

The players have said over and over again they have a lot of new things to learn.. If that means nothing to you, come out and say it. But to believe it will be exactly the same is stubborn on your part.

Way to reach on this article, the one and only that you can even reach on to try to back up your claim while every single other one proves Gman is wrong..

--------------------

Onto actual important discussions...

"With Carolina, you start with the offensive line. They're big and physical and that equates to a real good running game, and they've got a dynamic duo at running back. People say DeAngelo Williams is more the quick guy, but he's a powerful guy, too. He has outstanding leg drive and can break through tackles. Jonathan Stewart is the same type of back, only bigger, and they both catch the ball well.

Just thought I'd point this out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?

The article itself contradicts itself on your grand point..

Trgo ran mostly a Cover 3 while the article points out Meeks will have more of a Cover 2..

The players have said over and over again they have a lot of new things to learn.. If that means nothing to you, come out and say it. But to believe it will be exactly the same is stubborn on your part.

Way to reach on this article, the one and only that you can even reach on to try to back up your claim while every single other one proves Gman is wrong..

--------------------

Onto actual important discussions...

Just thought I'd point this out....

you can't put that much stock in what players say prior to a season b/c normally it doesn't pan out like the picture they paint. Plus, if Trgo never quit....they would still be learning lots of new stuff on D and would be saying the same things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...