Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Civil Lawsuit Filed Against Ben Roethlisberger


Skew

Recommended Posts

"At that point, he allowed her to get off the bed. McNulty claims that she went to the bathroom, and "tried to pull herself together."

^^^^^^^^^

So, she gets raped, and when he lets her go her thought process was "Let me go freshen up in the bathroom".

hmmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"At that point, he allowed her to get off the bed. McNulty claims that she went to the bathroom, and "tried to pull herself together."

^^^^^^^^^

So, she gets raped, and when he lets her go her thought process was "Let me go freshen up in the bathroom".

hmmmmmm

It's all about the details, just so people understand her clear recognition of that night....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether he did anything or not I wouldn't be surprised if he looses out on this, or ends up settling it quietly. Civil suits are usually slanted in the plaintiffs advantage. The defendant basically has to prove they did no harm vs the assumption of innocence until proven guilty in a criminal case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

espn sucks ass.and once again it all boils down too what color you are....lets say vince young did this i bet espn would have stop showing bullpoo sportscenter and begin talking about this story.its sad really, but like i said in another post.racism built this country and it will never go away.lets see how much gets swept under the carpet lmbao!!!!!!!

It is almost comical how damn near every thread on here becomes racial at some point. At least you can depend on the consistency of some people who post on here.

The case with Kobe started with criminal charges being filed quickly after the "alleged" incident.

This is a little different in that it is only a civil suit being filed a year after the "alleged" event.

Not inferring that one happened and the other didn't, but the latter smells a little more fishy on the surface....no pun intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is almost comical how damn near every thread on here becomes racial at some point. At least you can depend on the consistency of some people who post on here.

The case with Kobe started with criminal charges being filed quickly after the "alleged" incident.

This is a little different in that it is only a civil suit being filed a year after the "alleged" event.

Not inferring that one happened and the other didn't, but the latter smells a little more fishy on the surface....no pun intended.

how is it comical,when race does play a major role in everything.im saying espn should be all over this hell they thrive for poo like this but since its a civil case they aren't going to touch it is bs.hell i know kobe banged that girl just like ben banged this girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how is comical,when race does play a major role in everything.im saying espn should be all over this hell they thrive for poo like this but since its a civil case they aren't going to touch is bs.hell i know kobe banged that girl just like ben banged this girl.

No, no you don't. The trial hasn't even started. You know that we are innocent until proven guilty regardless of color or charge. Of course that seems to be more theory than in practice in public opinion, which I don't agree with. I agree with you, they would be all over this if it was not their golden child. And that's wrong, it's just wrong. But we can't convict until the evidence comes out. That would be wrong too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no you don't. The trial hasn't even started. You know that we are innocent until proven guilty regardless of color or charge. Of course that seems to be more theory than in practice in public opinion, which I don't agree with. I agree with you, they would be all over this if it was not their golden child. And that's wrong, it's just wrong. But we can't convict until the evidence comes out. That would be wrong too...

I'm with you on a double standard, but with this being a civil case it's more personnel than public, the KB case and this one don't necessarily compare as far as news worthiness..

Your neighbor could file a civil suit for your dog crapping on his lawn. Pro athletes, and their life styles (actually their wallets) are big ol targets, I'm amazed they don't get targeted more often... Fish in a barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no you don't. The trial hasn't even started. You know that we are innocent until proven guilty regardless of color or charge. Of course that seems to be more theory than in practice in public opinion, which I don't agree with. I agree with you, they would be all over this if it was not their golden child. And that's wrong, it's just wrong. But we can't convict until the evidence comes out. That would be wrong too...

kobe admitted he cheated, and in ben situation im pretty sure that lady wanted too.its not rape when both sides says its ok.all im saying is yeah she might have felt bad after and now she trying to save face.im not accusing him of rape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you on a double standard, but with this being a civil case it's more personnel than public, the KB case and this one don't necessarily compare as far as news worthiness..

Your neighbor could file a civil suit for your dog crapping on his lawn. Pro athletes, and their life styles (actually their wallets) are big ol targets, I'm amazed they don't get targeted more often... Fish in a barrel.

I'm in complete agreement with everything you said.

kobe admitted he cheated, and in ben situation im pretty sure that lady wanted too.its not rape when both sides says its ok.all im saying is yeah she might have felt bad after and now she trying to save face.im not accusing him of rape.

Then why play the race card? I agree that it exists and don't like it, but why play it if you don't believe it to be true as far as guilt is concerned? I don't understand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in complete agreement with everything you said.

Then why play the race card? I agree that it exists and don't like it, but why play it if you don't believe it to be true as far as guilt is concerned? I don't understand...

bc it shows how unconsistant things are.when blacks are in wrong,we hang them.when a white guy does it,he just don't know any better slap on the wrist.i hate that race plays part into things but real poo it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bc it shows how unconsistant things are.when blacks are in wrong,we hang them.when a white guy does it,he just don't know any better slap on the wrist.i hate that race plays part into things but real poo it does.

I don't like it either, I think it sucks, but you freely admit that you think it was consensual sex with regrets afterward, so I asked the question based upon that statement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like it either, I think it sucks, but you freely admit that you think it was consensual sex with regrets afterward, so I asked the question based upon that statement...

which i understand.....im saying america media loves for a black man to do something wrong and if he is rich its a plus bc he is going to get thrown under the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which i understand.....im saying america media loves for a black man to do something wrong and if he is rich its a plus bc he is going to get thrown under the bus.

No, some choose to use their brain instead of conveniently pulling out the race card instead. As far as Kobe, I think most may agree that he didn't rape her, but the issue most people had with Kobe was that he cheated on his wife. Im sure most people here would feel the same if Ben was married AND he admitted having sex with another woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, some choose to use their brain instead of conveniently pulling out the race card instead. As far as Kobe, I think most may agree that he didn't rape her, but the issue most people had with Kobe was that he cheated on his wife. Im sure most people here would feel the same if Ben was married AND he admitted having sex with another woman.

so bc he is not married its ok for this not to be in the media like other topics.thats the worst poo i've heard all day.....im not playing the race here just a little confused why espn is not touching this story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...