Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This would be unstoppable..limited basis..


adallastiger

Recommended Posts

Michael Vick with DeAngelo and Stewart running the triple option. Everyone said you can't use it at Georgia Tech...Paul Johnson proved otherwise and Georgia Tech will be sick offensively this year.

Agreed you don't want to risk losing your qb, but why would this not work on a limited basis, especially since Vick is not a bad passer.

Thoughts? Assuming Panthers could get Vick without any ramifications, on paper why would this not work for 4-6 plays a game.

Imagine Vick pitching out to D or Stewart!

I understand the blocking schemes in college that go along with this offense are illegal in the nfl...but that aside, what are your thoughts on this possibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummmm....no duymb idea. i know you aren't a panther fan (you are a dwill fan) so you wouldn't understand but......no.

bad idea.

monumentally bad and dumb.

and it has already been brought up a whole lot more than it should have.

mike vick should never ever be a panther and he never will be. i don't care how much sense it makes for some folk. it isn't and won't ever happen. thought makes me wanna puke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Vick didn't bring so much baggage/bad publicity/outrage to the fans, then I wouldn't mind seeing that happen.

But that being said, there's no way I would welcome Vick to our team with all the baggage that he brings.

not just the baggage.

he is the enemy. he is and always will be the falcons, imo. he is the dirty bird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...