Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WWE Network could change the landscape of PPV

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

The WWE Network launches Feb. 24 as a streaming service for $9.99 per month with a six-month commitment and will include all 12 pay-per-view events.

The network is available on desktops and laptops via WWE.com. WWE Network will also be available through the WWE App on: Amazon's Kindle Fire devices; Android devices such as Samsung Galaxy; iOS devices such as Apple iPad and iPhone; Roku streaming devices; PlayStation 3 and PlayStation 4; and Xbox 360.

"WWE Network will provide transformative growth for our company and unprecedented value for our fans," WWE Chairman and CEO Vince McMahon said Wednesday.

WWE joins the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB as the latest sports-based organization that has its own around-the-clock network. The network will air original content, including pregame and postgame shows for its flagship "Raw" on Monday nights, classic events, reality shows, documentaries and other forms of smashmouth programming. The on-demand content is the main selling point for an older audience looking to reconnect with the product.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/09/wwe-network_n_4565607.html?ir=Sports

 

DirecTV already sounds aggravated

"Clearly we need to quickly re-evaluate the economics and viability of their business with us, as it now appears the WWE feels they do not need their PPV distributors," DirecTV said in a statement, adding that the audience for its events "has been steadily declining, and this new low-cost competitive offering will only accelerate this trend."

 

http://www.awfulannouncing.com/2014/january/directv-isn-t-too-happy-with-the-wwe-network.html

 

Obviously this is just like the Netflix model. But WWE has a very large library of content that includes AWA, NWA, WCW, ECW, among others. Along with their other weekly TV shows. But the kicker is that the 9.99/month price includes every monthly ppv. It's a no brainier for fans that are already paying $55 every month (yes, they are still out there, even with Internet streams and such). If it works I wouldn't be surprised to see MMA and boxing companies try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I may get it but I think they missed the boat by not having it available on tv.

 

I don't.  Streaming on consoles, PC, and mobile devices is the way of the future.  People are dropping cable/satellite at an alarming rate and it will only continue because cable companies refuse to get smart and offer pay-per-channel pricing.   If they put it on TV they would be stuck dealing with annoying cable/sat companies who probably wouldn't let them offer it on other devices.  This way they control it 100% and I expect it to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

This is very interesting to me.  I am not a wresting fan, but the model is very interesting.  I'd be curious to see how long the streaming last before they have to shut the doors and go back to relying on the current TV company model.

 

I do think with the rise of actual SMART TVs (look at the WebOS TVs from LG!), we could see some movement towards the old internet TV that people like MS have been trying to get for decades!  That to me is the most exciting.

 

For too many years Telecoms like TWC, DirectTV, Dish, Comcast, ect have been gouging the socks off consumers.  The more we move to a pro-consumer model, the better for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

Streaming it to my TV is ok, but I don't really get the appeal of watching TV on a ipad screen. 

 

I didn't see the point until we got an ipad (and netflix and hulu plus once we cut cable).  On weekends, especially during football season, I like to be able to lounge around and watch what I want.  But by the time the 2 year old is in bed, my wife is beat, and I'd like to unwind without our damnable cats irritating the world.  Heck, it's also great to chill under the covers on a cold night, head phones in, and watching whatever it is I'm watching.  It's not for everyone, I'll admit that.  But it sure was nice to be able to catch some late night college football before passing out.  Then it's turn it off, put on night stand, and drift off to dream land.

 

It works for me.  Its very relaxing, even though everything I read says not to use electronics before bed.  Doesn't bother me!

 

I love the future of streaming TV channels.  Cut out TWC/DirectTV/Ect and get it straight from the provider.  They will catch on and start bettering their prices.  TWC is already feeling the pinch, I double my internet speed, and kept the same price for the year (which will have to be renegotiated next January when they try to nail me on a price increase).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rise of The Hive Apprentice

Rise of The Hive

Posted
Posted

I don't.  Streaming on consoles, PC, and mobile devices is the way of the future.  People are dropping cable/satellite at an alarming rate and it will only continue because cable companies refuse to get smart and offer pay-per-channel pricing.   If they put it on TV they would be stuck dealing with annoying cable/sat companies who probably wouldn't let them offer it on other devices.  This way they control it 100% and I expect it to be successful.

 

I guess if I had a PS3 I would get it but if I am going to be watching on the computer anyway I'll just stream it unless that gets taken away altogether by this somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

I didn't see the point until we got an ipad (and netflix and hulu plus once we cut cable).  On weekends, especially during football season, I like to be able to lounge around and watch what I want.  But by the time the 2 year old is in bed, my wife is beat, and I'd like to unwind without our damnable cats irritating the world.  Heck, it's also great to chill under the covers on a cold night, head phones in, and watching whatever it is I'm watching.  It's not for everyone, I'll admit that.  But it sure was nice to be able to catch some late night college football before passing out.  Then it's turn it off, put on night stand, and drift off to dream land.

 

It works for me.  Its very relaxing, even though everything I read says not to use electronics before bed.  Doesn't bother me!

 

I love the future of streaming TV channels.  Cut out TWC/DirectTV/Ect and get it straight from the provider.  They will catch on and start bettering their prices.  TWC is already feeling the pinch, I double my internet speed, and kept the same price for the year (which will have to be renegotiated next January when they try to nail me on a price increase).

 

TWC will be safe for a while because of its internet connection.  And I have a feeling they and the other providers are going to make up for the tv losses in other ways. 

 

I still  am not fond of watching on my laptop or tablet though.  Much prefer my 50 inch plasma.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

TWC will be safe for a while because of its internet connection.  And I have a feeling they and the other providers are going to make up for the tv losses in other ways. 

 

I still  am not fond of watching on my laptop or tablet though.  Much prefer my 50 inch plasma. 

 

We'll see how safe TWC is.  Charter is trying to buy them, and it's getting ugly!

 

I agree it's preferable to watch good content on the ole plasma (2011 Panny for me), but streaming is super convenient.  Since I don't have a cable subscription, streaming is key for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Panthers Preseason

      By frankw · Posted

      Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...