Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody is talking DE in the first?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Assuming that we lose Greg Hardy-- nobody seems concerned about that void.  We just had a 12-win demonstration on how important it is to pressure the passer and stop the run and we lose one of the best players on the front 7.

 

DEs are expensive, so I doubt we find quality in free agency.  The draft has some talent at DE early, but it drops off quickly.  If we are going to have 1 DE on an expensive second contract, then we need to rotate them so we always have a first and a second contract at the position--Hardy shows us that we cannot afford 2 second contracts.  Since Johnson has a few years left on his deal, I cannot think of a better time to grab a stud.

 

Hardy would have drawn about $12.5 or so if we tagged him.  A rookie at the 28th spot will earn about $7 million over 4 years.  Putting that in perspective, Hardy will want about $50 million for 4 years (rough guess).  Now think Cam and Kuechly.  Think 2014 and the Cap hell we are in personified by Stewart and Godfrey.   So if we draft a DE he plays for under $2 million total per season, Hardy commands more than 10 times that. 

 

Hypothetically speaking, lets say we decide to draft a solid DE at #28.  We have $11 million more to spend in free agency.  Say we re-sign Gross at $4m, Ginn at $2m, Munnerlyn at $2m, and Mitchell at $2.5m.  So now think of it this way:

 

Gross

and

Mitchell

and

Munnerlyn

and

Ginn

and

Stanford DE Trent Murphy...............or..................Greg Hardy

 

That would leave about $9 million under the cap.  A free agent WR and a CB.

 

My draft would change to something like this (I am using http://fanspeak.com/ontheclock/):

 

28
DE TRENT MURPHY (known pass rusher from 2 and 3 pt. stances--very versatile with high motor)
STANFORD
60
OT MORGAN MOSES (Long arns and nice feet.  Gross's replacement in 2015 and RT in 2014)
VIRGINIA
92
WR DONTE MONCRIEF   (we signed a free agent too)
MISSISSIPPI
124
CB KEITH MCGILL  (Re-signed Munnerlyn, signed a free agent, and still have White)
UTAH
156
S JONATHAN DOWLING (Need competition at SS and/or depth at FS)
WESTERN KENTUCKY
188
G MICHAEL SCHOFIELD (He won't be this low, but a solid, versatile lineman here)
MICHIGAN

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy I want if we have to go DE early is Dominique Easley. Really similar to Hardy. Versatile guy you can line up on the interior or outside. High motor, great burst off the snap. Bit of an injury concern, but I'm not terribly worried. I do like Murphy too because of his length in addition to the things you already mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, bc we're not going DE in the 1st.

 

If Hardy's gone and there's not a legit WR or OT there it really wouldn't shock me. I prefer to trade Hardy for a second (if we don't keep him) and use one of those 2's on a DE but nothing is out of the realm of possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Hardy's gone and there's not a legit WR or OT there it really wouldn't shock me. I prefer to trade Hardy for a second (if we don't keep him) and use one of those 2's on a DE but nothing is out of the realm of possibility.

 

There's not a single DE in this class worth taking at 28 who is not named Clowney.

 

Tuitt is intriguing but he looks like he could really be a NFL DT.

 

Murphy led the nation in sack, but the kid is pretty slow. And, struggled this week in practice.

 

If we wanted a DE that bad, "Marcus" Smith is name in the 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's not a single DE in this class worth taking at 28 who is not named Clowney.

 

Tuitt is intriguing but he looks like he could really be a NFL DT.

 

Murphy led the nation in sack, but the kid is pretty slow. And, struggled this week in practice.

 

If we wanted a DE that bad, Chris Smith is name in the 2nd round.

 

You lost me here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You lost yourself here....

 

"If Hardy's gone and there's not a legit WR or OT there it really wouldn't shock me."

 

Yes because one of the franchise caliber LT's in this draft are going to drop like a rock to 28. You really aren't good at this poo chuck...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes because one of the franchise caliber LT's in this draft are going to drop like a rock to 28. You really aren't good at this poo chuck...

 

Ill take a Tiny Richarson, Morgan Moses, or even a Guard of Gabe Jackson caliber at 28 before any DE after Clowney.

 

I'm pretty good at this stuff. You know it too. But haters gon hate.

 

I'm not the poo cutting both Dwill and Stew and acting like it's realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's not a single DE in this class worth taking at 28 who is not named Clowney.

Tuitt is intriguing but he looks like he could really be a NFL DT.

Murphy led the nation in sack, but the kid is pretty slow. And, struggled this week in practice.

If we wanted a DE that bad, "Marcus" Smith is name in the 2nd round.

If Hardy leaves I could see us getting Jackson Jeffcoat in the second maybe third if we're lucky.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Hardy leaves I could see us getting Jackson Jeffcoat in the second maybe third if we're lucky.

 

I'm all for a DE if Hardy is not retained, but not in the first round.

 

We have like three guys that are ready to contribute on the roster right now: Alexander, Horton, and Addison.

 

Also, we'd be rather smart to go after a FA like Willie Young.

 

This draft is deep everywhere you look at. We'll still be able to find a talented DE in the 3rd round to develop: Marcus Smith, Kareem Smith, Ed Stinson, Aaron Lynch, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...