Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4K TV


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So today while the future wife and teenage future stepdaughter were discussing the subtle nuances of several pairs of boots, the teenage future stepson and I decided we'd rather be checking out electronics and took off to a conveniently nearby Best Buy store.

While there, I got my first in-person look at a Samsung 4K TV.

My word, it was fantastic :blink:

Part of me almost wishes I hadn't seen it. Mind you, I've got a great TV, but this was like nothing I've ever seen before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network infrastructure will need to catch up before this becomes main stream. It will be fairly useless on the average broadband connection today.

 

Blu Ray will catch up faster than that though.

 

I researched HDTVs for months before buying one.  This?  Probably a few years before I'll be ready to go for it.  Kind of got other priorities at the moment.

 

By my electronic lust has definitely gained a new object :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blu Ray will catch up faster than that though.

 

I researched HDTVs for months before buying one.  This?  Probably a few years before I'll be ready to go for it.  Kind of got other priorities at the moment.

 

By my electronic lust has definitely gained a new object :unsure:

 

Bit of advice, stop buying off the shelf media.

 

The future is streaming media. You won't be able to purchase a disc of any kind in 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of advice, stop buying off the shelf media.

 

The future is streaming media. You won't be able to purchase a disc of any kind in 10 years.

 

Getting a WiFi blu-ray player soon.

 

I agree it's going in that direction, but I don't think it'll go completely away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blu Ray will catch up faster than that though.

 

I researched HDTVs for months before buying one.  This?  Probably a few years before I'll be ready to go for it.  Kind of got other priorities at the moment.

 

By my electronic lust has definitely gained a new object :unsure:

Blu Ray is also catching up with DVD's to be obsolete.

 

Why litter your home with crap when you can buy a movie and stream it in high definition at any time from anywhere?

 

I haven't purchased a physical movie in several years and never will again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing to know about 4K tv is, most are only running 4K resolution at 30hz.  If you are using for a pc gaming or anything like that, its not cut out for that.  Video will be fine. This is the tv I bought and will arrive today,

 

http://www.walmart.com/ip/TCL-LE50UHDE5691-50-4K-UHD-2160p-120Hz-LED-HDTV-4K-x-2K/33683968

 

Its way better than what I have now and theres no point in spending $3K on new technology until its refined.  The upscaling on this should be pretty nice.  If not back to walmart it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...