Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton tied with Brees


stirs

Recommended Posts

I don't agree with that at all. ESPN is a complete joke. Newton's a top 10 QB, but not quite top 5. He'll get there, especially when he gets some weapons, but he's just not there yet.

 

Bears GM was the one who made the list.

ESPN guy reporting it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these quarterback rankings are just opinions anyway, everyone has a different view. I don't care where he's ranked, I just want to win.

 

The comments are entertaining as usual though.

 

20qf82a.gif

 

that is possibly the most accurate, non fan evaluation of cam I have ever read... I mean I love me some Cam but I completely agree with this dude. 

 

*Edit* I skipped the first line of this dude's comment when I wrote what I said above. I'm not going to be a douchenozzle and delete what I wrote, but I backtrack on this comment on Page 2. I don't hate cam, he reads defenses like a third year QB should, I was talking about the rest of what he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is possibly the most accurate, non fan evaluation of cam I have ever read... I mean I love me some Cam but I completely agree with this dude. 

 

He's not good at reading defenses? How is this accurate? I would like you to explain unless you are just an idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you clearly missed this past season where Cam was one of the most efficient QBs on third down.

Can't read a defense? Yeah, sorry. He's not Kaeperdick.

Cracka McNasty was pretty vocal here against drafting Newton anyway, I'm totally shocked he shares that guys opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...