Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joel Corry says franchising Hardy would eat up all of our cap space


panther4life

Recommended Posts

someone more twitter savvy will have to post the link but its on twitter.

 

The exact quote was "Franchising Greg Hardy at 12.82M would eat up all of Carolina's cap room"

 

Just an fyi this guy seems to be in the know on the cap more than most out there.

 

His background is as former sports agent and now currently a writer for cbs sports and the national football post on salary cap related issues.

 

And yes he said this after the news of the cap going up to 130 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap-hit/

 

We have $11.9M now with the 130 ceiling. This guy is a former NFL agent and is a constant source for information around the league. He's a numbers guy so most of his information is cap related. He was recently on ross tucker's podcast (good episode that shows his knowledge and background) and has a clear understanding of the cap. I'd take his work on any cap related topic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tagging hardy would be a mistake unless we were sure we would be able to either trade him to another team or sign him to a more cap friendly deal....but the truth is, the amount he'd get paid a year would probably sit right around where they tag $ is so we'd likely still be in the same situation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure you can rescind the franchise tag at any point. If that's the case then we could tag him, try to extend him or find a trade partner and if nothing works out rescind the tag and let him hit free agency. We're not going to be players in the first wave of free agency where guys are getting massively overpaid anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh so even with the extra money we tag hardy and have about $2mil left over for cam and 20 free agents oh and this years draft class! Dream on people, even with restructuring contracts there is no way possible hardy is a panther next season not unless you only want a 30 man roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is right that franchising him would eat up too much cap but that is not nearly the complete story here.  First off I hear numbers that range from we have 13 million to 28 million.  It would be nice to be just a little more precise.  Plus we will only franchise him in order to work out a long term deal or trade him.  We are not going to be looking at a 13 million dollar cap hit.  If we sign him long term that cap hit goes down to something in the 5-7 million range in 2014.  That is more than doable given the increase in cap from last year.  The cap will go up significantly the next 2 years and with the dead money gone, we can do whatever we need to do.

 

On the other hand I don't know that Gettleman is that intent on keeping Hardy if he felt this would send a bad message to other players that we will pay a ton for one player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is right that franchising him would eat up too much cap but that is not nearly the complete story here. First off I hear numbers that range from we have 13 million to 28 million. It would be nice to be just a little more precise. Plus we will only franchise him in order to work out a long term deal or trade him. We are not going to be looking at a 13 million dollar cap hit. If we sign him long term that cap hit goes down to something in the 5-7 million range in 2014. That is more than doable given the increase in cap from last year. The cap will go up significantly the next 2 years and with the dead money gone, we can do whatever we need to do.

On the other hand I don't know that Gettleman is that intent on keeping Hardy if he felt this would send a bad message to other players that we will pay a ton for one player.

What's the dead money projected for next offseason? They can half CJ contract surely this year and just change it from guaranteed to bonus money that way it halfs his cap hit alone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the dead money projected for next offseason? They can half CJ contract surely this year and just change it from guaranteed to bonus money that way it halfs his cap hit alone?

Can't really project that until all the cuts are made.  You could restructure Johnson and save some money but 9,000,000 of his 16 million cap hit is salary not signing bonus.  

 

 

 

I know it is heresy but if you cut Johnson you could make him a June 1st designation and save 8 million in cap space this year and 9 million next year.  Honestly I would take Hardy over Johnson at this point given the money saving and recent production.

 

Yeah I know this will piss off tons of folks but his cap hit is approaching Peppers money.  This year it is 16 million and next year it is over 17 million.  He simply isn't worth that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
×
×
  • Create New...