Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who got 16 reps on the bench press today


top dawg

Recommended Posts

It was somewhat amazing that this little guy got so many reps.  If you look at him, you'd probably say "naaaahhh!"  I was expecting big Benjamin to get more than he got (which I believe was 12).  Brandon Coleman got 21, as did Jordan Matthews. Cody Latimer was the top at 23. Jeff Janis and Mike Campanro got 20, and Martavis Bryant and Sammy Watkins tied with Cooks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a guy who can go up, and get the ball. Stop looking for the next Steve Smith. Too many Marty Hurney's here.

 

That's just fuging stupid. Cooks is on his way to cementing a first round grade and perhaps is a nice surprise coming out of the NFL Combine. Smith ain't got poo to do with it. 

 

BTW, Smith was a total surprise. We got fuging lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just fuging stupid. Cooks is on his way to cementing a first round grade and perhaps is a nice surprise coming out of the NFL Combine. Smith ain't got poo to do with it. 

 

It's great to be enamored with a player, but we are unlikely to be able to draft him anyway, and Cam Newton needs a bigger target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's great to be enamored with a player, but we are unlikely to be able to draft him anyway, and Cam Newton needs a bigger target.

 

I'm not enamored with anyone. Like I have said before, I will be good with whomever G-man picks. Furthermore, Cam needs play-makers---no matter the size. That's what Cam needs: play-makers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, I have a different view of it. I think that just the opposite is very true, and often proven on our very own team.  Look at the impact that CMC had when he was here.  Look at how bring in two top rate IOL to play guard last season made a huge difference in finally getting a stable front for Bryce to live behind. It took a while for it to bear fruit, but those last games were just relevatory. And off ball linebackers like Luke Kuechly, not just running a defense but dictating the game when he's on the field, truly remarkable what a difference that makes. Personally, he had as much or maybe even more to do with that Super Bowl appearance as Cam did.  What I see in the NFL is teams trying hard to cover up for a lack of good linebackers by stacking the D-line. But it gives them a crust defense, one that is hard and crunchy on the outside but a feast within. Linebackers shouldn't just rule the middle of the field, but should be directing traffic and working as enforcers.  But hey, whatever. "Devalued" positions often come back to bite you in the ass when they are neglected. Ask anyone who has had to clean up the mess left behind by a former college coach who took over a pro team and brought their college recruiting mindset in. Yanno, like Matt Rhule did.   
    • I see it this way--XL was raw.  Raw players when drafted who are forced to start immediately are very raw players in the NFL-- How is he helped? TMac will shift the focus of the defense away from XL.  XL will be more experienced.  He will have an offseason of jugs work.  He is a very good athlete.  He can only get better.  Wallace?  Same thing.  He will get better with an improved defensive front and the addition of these heat-seeking head hunters at S.  I think about the players we will have on defense in 2025 that we did not have in 2024. Derrick Brown. DE Brown III NT Wharton DE Jones Edge Moehrig S Princely. Edge Scourton. Edge Ransom. S Cam Jackson NT Roseboom  LB While we may not know what we have, we know what we don't have--  
    • If he hit the jugs machine, X is going to beast. He got open a lot. He just didn't bring it in consistently.  
×
×
  • Create New...