Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things we know about Gman!


Gin and Juice

Recommended Posts

He seems to be very direct and a man of his word, that said, let's review!

1)Draft BPA-proven! Which means we will not go into the draft "looking" for our starting LT!

2)Fill all roster holes via Free Agency-proven! Not to say he won't pick up some more players after June 1st cuts!

3)We are cap strapped-true! Only obvious relief is with June 1st cuts!

Now, restructures are bad, unless equipped with void clauses. Essentially, a restructure is moving base salary to guaranteed money the following year(s). We know we don't have enough money to sign our draft picks, minus the free agents to fill the holes. We know his philosophy is fill holes with Free Agents! That being said, something big is about to come out of Charlotte that has us freeing up cap space!

Only logical immediate choices(add more if you see them)-

1)Extend CJ-same core deal, just over a long span......guarantee more of the money. CJ would make out better being a June 1st cut so he has no incentive to extend other than taking one for the team!

2)Sign Hardy to a long term deal-obviously they aren't on the same page or would've been done.

3)Trade Hardy for draft picks!

Kalil, JStew, and Dwill have already restructured....meaning no solutions there. Nothing substantial can be done at the moment with anyone else! A lot can happen with June 1st cuts. But something has to happen now in order for Gman to follow his team building philosophy.......so which is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple of clarifications.  Restructures aren't bad and adding void years is not good.  Some contracts are designed to help with short term cap situations and are designed to be restructured.  Smitty's contract for one.  Given that we are dumping 17 million in dead cap space and the cap is going up substantially the next 2 years, restructures are not going to hurt us as long as we don't do it all the time.  Void years like we did with Gross are not good things because it lowers the cap in one year but when we void the contract the money accelerates and leaves us with a big dead cap issue.  The 17 million is due to primarily Beason restructuring (8 million) and Gross when the contract voided left us with a 5 million dead cap issue.

 

If we extend Johnson we need to be straight with him and give him some guaranteed money but like Gross tell him if he doesn't take less he is gone after this year    He got plenty of guaranteed money and his cap hit of 16 million this year and 17 million next year is crazy for the production we got. If you restructure you just guarantee a 20 million cap in 2015 which makes him a prime candidate to release given his dead cap money next year is 6 million IIRC.  He will be here this year because the dead cap space and his normal cap hit are both 16 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen restructured and Smitty cut.

 Olsen isn't a prime candidate to restructure again since his contract only runs through 2015 and you are simply putting more money onto next year when his cap is already 8 million likely to go up to 9 or 10 million.  Unless you don't see him in the long term plans.  If you do then you extend him another 2 or 3 years and roll this contract into that one and reduce the cap hit going forward while retaining his services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple of clarifications. Restructures aren't bad and adding void years is not good. Some contracts are designed to help with short term cap situations and are designed to be restructured. Smitty's contract for one. Given that we are dumping 17 million in dead cap space and the cap is going up substantially the next 2 years, restructures are not going to hurt us as long as we don't do it all the time. Void years like we did with Gross are not good things because it lowers the cap in one year but when we void the contract the money accelerates and leaves us with a big dead cap issue. The 17 million is due to primarily Beason restructuring (8 million) and Gross when the contract voided left us with a 5 million dead cap issue.

If we extend Johnson we need to be straight with him and give him some guaranteed money but like Gross tell him if he doesn't take less he is gone after this year He got plenty of guaranteed money and his cap hit of 16 million this year and 17 million next year is crazy for the production we got. If you restructure you just guarantee a 20 million cap in 2015 which makes him a prime candidate to release given his dead cap money next year is 6 million IIRC. He will be here this year because the dead cap space and his normal cap hit are both 16 million.

Aren't we like $110mil towards the cap already in 2015? Without Cam and Luke's deals? How much dead money is already accounted for next year?. I expect the cap to be around $150 next year so will allow us breathing space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have clarified Void is good when timed properly with contract!

I agree, no real incentive to June 1st cut CJ! You do gain a lot of cap space but also tie up a lot of dead space, only cause his contract is 50/50ish Base to Prorated Bonus! We can only hope he goes for an extension of current deal, laced with some more guaranteed!

Looking at it, nobody is really a candidate for restructure that majorly frees up money we need! Only options I see are the 3 I presented! The cap going up makes it easier to re-sign Cam, Luke, Star, and Short! That's the way I view it.....not a safe haven for restructures! At some point we have to let a big contract go, question is.....when?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let’s be real, there’s no way the Bengals can trade him for less than first round value from an optics stand point.
    • Disclaimer:  In June, I am usually optimistic.  In October, a policeman with a bullhorn is telling me that I have a lot of life ahead of me and to think about my loved ones as I gaze down upon him from my rooftop.   Having said that, I think our offense (down the stretch) was good enough to play KC and Philly tough.  So how many games would this offense have won if they played the entire season like they did in November-January and if they had a better defense?   If you could stretch the last nine games over an entire season and put a solid defense on the other side, I see 5 wins becoming 7 or 8.  Down the stretch, the Panther D surrendered 30 points or more in 5 of the final 7 games and managed to win 2 of those 5.  If they can win 40% of games in which their defense surrenders 30 points or more, then the math indicates, had that been the case all season, the Panthers should have won 6 or 7 games with their defense surrendering 30+ points.   This season, we are much better at WR (TMac, Renfrow, Horn, and I expect XL to be a lot better).  Bryce is confident and now a leader.    The Achilles' heel of the 2024 defense, the DL, seems to be very solid.  We got back Horn and Jackson on the corners, Smith-Wade is improving better than expected, we signed a stud Safety.  Derrick Brown returns.  While the D is not there yet, it is going to be better.   So if we ended the second half of 2024 playing at a level that should have produced 6-7 wins, better WRs and a better defense could result in 9 wins or more.       
×
×
  • Create New...