Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All this Gettleman hate....


Varking

Recommended Posts

I don't think most are upset at the sheer fact that Steve was released.  There were a lot of valid reasons to let Smith go.  But just the way it was handled was botched so badly, it does make Gettleman look pretty cold and borderline arrogant.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the right to question someone who has let basically all of our secondary, receiving corp and o-line go and brought in literally no one to replace them. For whatever Hurney did wrong, he never left these sorts of gaping holes.

 

Hurney never left gaping holes? :blink:

 

How often did we have a solid receiving corps or interior defensive front under Hurney?

 

Heck, how many times did we have a good cornerback not named Chris Gamble?

 

How good were we at tight end in the years before we finally got Greg Olsen?

 

Who played quarterback between Jake Delhomme and Cam Newton?

 

Hurney managed this team from 2002 through 2012, and out of the eleven seasons he was in charge we had only three winning campaigns. 

 

This is not someone I would hold up as a model of consistency :unsure:

 

And can we please remember that our final roster will be set somewhere around six months from now, not tomorrow?

 

Sheesh folks :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney never left gaping holes? :blink:

How often did we have a solid receiving corps or interior defensive front under Hurney?

Heck, how many times did we have a good cornerback not named Chris Gamble?

How good were we at tight end in the years before we finally got Greg Olsen?

Who played quarterback between Jake Delhomme and Cam Newton?

Hurney managed this team from 2002 through 2012, and out of the eleven seasons he was in charge we had only three winning campaigns.

This is not someone I would hold up as a model of consistency.

We had a clear number one at ALL of these positions. Poor depth, but top-loaded and with a clear starter. You 're telling me we have clear starters at line, wideout, and secondary?

We have 5 million and 7 draft picks. That's not nearly enough to fix even two of our holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a clear number one at ALL of these positions. Poor depth, but top-loaded and with a clear starter. You 're telling me we have clear starters at line, wideout, and secondary?

We have 5 million and 7 draft picks. That's not nearly enough to fix even two of our holes.

 

And that formula got us three winning seasons out of eleven and cap hell that is taking years to fix.

 

Do you really wanna go back to that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that formula got us three winning seasons out of eleven and cap hell that is taking years to fix.

Do you really wanna go back to that?

Yes, because everyone questioning Gettleman just loves everything Marty Hurney does.

I wonder if you'll all be shouting Gettleman's praises when we are 4-12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because everyone questioning Gettleman just loves everything Marty Hurney does.

I wonder if you'll all be shouting Gettleman's praises when we are 4-12.

 

You were the one holding Hurney up as a positive example.

 

And if we go 4-12 this year and become perennial contenders beginning the following year, I'll ultimately be fine with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only reason Hurney should be invoked here is due to the salary cap issues.

 

Gettleman has just sat idly as we have endured the largest purge I can ever remember in our history outside of maybe Fox's first year (for good reason) and following our Superbowl in 2003.

 

It is not looking good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were the one holding Hurney up as a positive example.

And if we go 4-12 this year and become perennial contenders beginning the following year, I'll ultimately be fine with it.

A small facet of his, yes.

Good lord you guys act like we were the fugging Lions or sonething.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the right to question someone who has let basically all of our secondary, receiving corp and o-line go and brought in literally no one to replace them. For whatever Hurney did wrong, he never left these sorts of gaping holes.

Most of the guys who are gone either retired, or were one year rentals. In case you haven't noticed, plenty of teams sign players for a year, knowing they're not long term solutions either because they're band aids or too pricey for a multi year contract. Revis is a one year rental for the Pats. Hardy may be a rental for us. 

 

As for bringing in no one to fill the holes, it's March 13th, not August, and bidding against other teams for the hottest FA's isn't practical for this team, at this point in time, thanks in large part to Mr. Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...