Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think that we can all agree on JC and JJ, but what about JF as another target for Cam?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I think that we can all agree that we'd be pleased, if not downright relieved, if Gettleman could somehow work his magic on Jesus C---pardon me---Jerricho Cotchery and James Jones in particular.  They would be solid signings, if not downright spectacular if Gettleman could somehow squeeze in Jermichael Finley into the fold.  We're still dealing with little money, but I would hope that the lure of Cam and a possible longer term future with a championship contender would make Finley chill on his seemingly prima-donna-like ways and consider following his ex-teammate (provided we can even get that done).  The Seahawks had been showing Finley interest, and still may be, but they just re-upped Zach Miller.

 

That would be a nice trifecta of sorts with as little money as we're dealing with this off-season. And it would make G-man look like a motherfuging boss, even if we did all know it was by luck and default.

 

 

What do you say? That's me, always trying to think outside the box.  Nice trifecta, indeed. That, or call the Raiders about that 5th round pick for Denarius Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought you meant Jacoby Ford, who could effectively replace Ginn. 

 

Well, admittedly that's probably more likely.  I'd rather have Finley's services though...I think. The pass catching TE would probably provide a better target for Cam, particularly with how Shula wants to call games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Avant....mr reliable will be in the mix I'm sure

 

I see Cotchery and Avant filling the same purpose, so it would surprise me if we sign both. Cotchery is obviously the first choice. He would make for a fine stop-gap WR3 with possible WR2 upside. I kind of see King playing that same type of WR3 role, but who knows.  Avant, due to his lack of YAC is probably only a WR3 at best. And I doubt that Shula's play calling wouldn't bring out his best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...