Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hybrid Wildcat?


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Hybrid Wildcat? Well how would that work? Well as you all know we have a big tall quarterback that can run like the wind, by the name of Cam Newton. Imagine if we had another big tall quarterback that could run even faster AND catch the ball? We do, his name is Joe Webb. 

 

 

Imagine the look on the face of the opposing defense if we came out with a two QB wildcat package. Hate it or love it I think it would be hilarious. Put Tolbert out there too and you wouldn't know what's about to happen.

 

the possibilities are endless!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a terrible idea.

 

edit: To expand, we saw last year that the wildcat for us was a mediocre running play at best, esp. in the 2nd half of the season.  While Webb may find his way onto the field, I am never in favor of taking the ball completely out of Cam's hands and using him as a distraction. He is our biggest playmaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Shula.

That's whole pie worthy bruh.

I don't see us keeping 3 QBs, but I love that he's so versatile. Just can't see them dressing 3 QBs on game day, but of course he could dress as a WR and be the emergency QB.

At the same time, we had a hybrid before (Armanti Edwards) with a much more creative o-coordinator by the name of Chudzinski, and he was never used at all.

As Mr Red said, two words, one name

Mike Shula

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.

You need some one with real talent not just a scrub to take some of the reps Cam will miss.

Plus we need to find a backup QB for the future bc we are bound and determine to get Cam hurt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...