Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Amazing Huddle Draft Contest!


Zod

Recommended Posts

R1 #28: OT Morgan Moses (Virginia)

R2 #60: WR Coty Latimer (Indiana)

R3 #92: WR Martavius Bryant (Clemson)

R4 #128: CB Jaylen Watkins (Florida)

R5 #168: OLB Adrian Hubbard (Alabama)

R6 #204: OT Brandon Thomas (Clemson)

R7 #225: CB Chris Davis (Auburn)

 

Latimer and Bryant have potential to be the next Brandon Marshall/Alshon Jeffery combo

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round 1 - Carlos Hyde RB

Round 2 - Jeremy Hill RB

Round 3 - Tre Mason RB

Round 4 - Bishop Sankey RB

Round 5 - Lache Seastrunk RB

Round 6 - Antonio Andrews RB

Round 7 - De'Anthony Thomas RB

Do we get bonus points for predicting Matt Hurney's picks? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round 1 - Jimmie Ward SS / Northern Illinois

Round 2 - Billy Turner OT / North Dakota State

Round 3 - Robert Herron WR / Wyoming

Round 4 - Jordan Tripp OLB / Montana

Round 5 - Laurent Duvernay-Tardif / McGill

Round 6 - Garrett Gilbert QB / SMU

Round 7 - Philly Brown WR / Ohio State

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a couple maaay get 4 or less, about everyone will get 0.

 

 

zob be nice if you could add points for correct playing position. example i got lee at 28, but latimer gos they i still get .5 for lee being WR. otherwise this will be a soccer score draft scores. you have to add other ways to score more points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...