panthers55

41 and you are worried about seeing us not win a Superbowl. In my screen name the 55 stands for the year I was born. I have been here since the start. I couldn't afford to go to Superbowl 38 but did go to Superbowl 50 and took the whole family. I really did think we were going to win. I said I hoped it wouldn't take another 12 years but it looks like it might. So I can bitch and worry about the Panthers not winning a Superbowl in my lifetime. Wait another 25 or 30 years and if we haven't win one by then, you are justified in worrying and bitching. Just saying..... For the record I think we will be in a superbowl in 5 years and hopefully we finally win one. I plan to be there when we do.

If scenario 1 occurs then the staff have to decide who to play and it could blow back on starting Young if he goes out and we keep losing. Might mean he sits for a while like Mahomes and many others gave. Scenarios 2 and 3 would indicate Dalton sucks and actually increase the chances Young starts the next game. But honestly the notion the staff sucks is not going to fly with most knowledgeable folks who thought we would struggle out of the gate with new staff and a rookie qb.

Good writeup. It confirms what seemed clear was that Bryce got rattled and those interceptions did play tricks with his head. He became hesitant when he needed to throw on timing, and chucked the ball out of bounds in the direction of a covered receiver when his first read got shut down. I expect him to be improved against a potentially tougher defense.

You are ignoring the obvious though. If you listened to the announcers talking football when they werent slobbobbing the Falcons and Bijan, they made the point that Atlanta's defense was predicated on keeping everything short and in front of them. So Bryce was taking what the defense was giving him. He isn't good enough yet to dictate to the defense so of course everything was short or incomplete. Expect the Saints to do the same while bringing more pressure. Hopefully we work on more intermediate to long passes while cleaning up the shorter stuff over the middle.

So let's talk about playcalling. How much was gameplanning, poor adjusting, poor execution, or something else. You see the play run not the play called or what adjustments were or were not made. Were the protections good or not? How many plays like that first 4th and 1 were intentionally called right over the left to see what we are capable of rather than trying to score using a finesse play which stood a better chance of success. The playcalling wasn't adequate and the execution was poor. But I am withholding judgement until I see some more games.

I think it is obvious to folks who frequent this site that certain posters beat the same old dead horses and have players or coaches they don't like and constantly complain about. So I don't need to point out what is clear to anyone paying attention.

Didn't mention you. Feeling guilty??

Seems like everyone with an ax to grind are coming out of the woodwork to complain about their same old issues legitimate or not. While I dont have an agenda, I am always glad to give my 2 cwntssolicited or otherwise .What I saw was a quarterback who started off pretty well but after those picks became tentative and held the ball. Sometimes we had folks open early but Bryce held the ball hoping for more seperation which in fact gVe defenders time to recover. On those long balls Young was putting them way out in front rather than giving them air for the receiver to catch up if necessary. Totally understandable for a rookie qb playing in his first action. Hopefully he will bounce back and play better on Monday night. I have heard it said that teams make the most progress between week 1 and 2. We will see shortly.

Again the myth is that the cap really limits you when it is actually judging talent poorly and guaranteeing too much money so you end up with a ton of dead cap money dumping or trading players, injuries or guys that retire prematurely. Why do some teams stay in cap hell while others dont??

They aren't saying anything because they have said repeatedly that you need to ask Burns and he isn't talking. Burns isn't going to hold out but if he says that up front regardless of the negotiations he just gave away a huge bargaining chip and he isn't doing that. The Wednesday deadline was the point at which he had to report if he was going to play this weekend.

Why practice yesterday and today if he isn't planning to play??

This was yesterday when he practiced. https://www.panthers.com/news/notebook-brian-burns-hasn-t-made-himself-a-distraction-frank-reich-says#:~:text=CHARLOTTE – Outside linebacker Brian Burns,termed a "personal matter." You keep showing you don't have a clue

In order to play against Atlanta he would have to show up by Wednesday. I read he was at practice Wednesday. I think actions speak louder than words. Did you hear he wasn't at practice Wednesday or today?

Here are two. I have lots more but this was in the last week. https://clutchpoints.com/panthers-news-brian-burns-stance-on-not-holding-out-amid-contract-negotiation-will-excite-carolina-fans https://www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/37896/ive-got-to-be-here-why-panthers-brian-burns-isnt-holding-out

Look at every interview he has done in the last month.

Burns is back at practice and says he plans to play. Why pages after pages about what he will lose when he has been at practice all this week?

Not saying there isn't a limit just saying that the cap isn't the big issue you and others make it out to be. Again we all agree there is a salary cap, you don't need to say it over and over when everyone agrees there is a number that goes up most every year. The myth is that is can't be easily manipulated to the point that it doesn't stop you from getting the players you want or kills your roster if you pay someone a premium like Burns which is what the whole conversation is about. Or that you can't spend more cash in a year than the cap allows So once again there is a cap but it is is not the impediment you and others suggest. And given it can be manipulated so easily, it really isn't a problem for creative cap managers I would hardly use Gettleman as an example of what to do. He was largely a disaster with his fruit basket turnover every year.

One thought. Maybe we should wait to see what the actual contract says before whining about how much he is getting. If it is Bosa money then bitch, otherwise it is rather premature.

Thanks for the validation. If you think it is wrong I must be on the right track.

Then you restructure a few guys and get under the cap again like New Orleans did this year to sign Carr. Again the cap is just a number that teams get around a dozen ways. The idea that you can't manipulate it to get who you want is the myth. So yeah it isn't the big impediment that you and others here think it is.

Of course the money doesn't disappear. That is an extreme mischaracterization. But if you actually spend 280 million a year and only have to account for 250 in any one year, it is gone for now given the NFL stands for Not For Long. And you can keep kicking the excess down the line which seems what all the teams are doing these days. So it didn't disappear but it doesn't all show up on the salary cap in the year it was paid. Seems if you aren't doing that then you are at a competitive disadvantage.

The myth is not that there is a cap. Of course there is a cap. The myth is that you can't sign the players you want or need because of the cap. What I said was that there are many ways to manipulate the cap so it isn't worth all the angst that everyone here gives it. Look at Hill as an example. You really think Kansas City couldn't have kept Hill if they really wanted to? Of course they could but it might mean coaching up some cheap rookies and UDFAs instead of JAG vets who cost 5 times as much and will still be backups. The myth is that the cap, if it 250 million, is all you can spend and it is the same for everyone. Not true at all. Cash over cap through signing bonuses and restructures allows a team to spend 10s of millions more that gets prorated. Add on some voidable years and incentives and you can fit most any salary you want under the salary cap without having to gut your roster in the process. It favors owners like Tepper who have deep pockets and want to spend the money to bring a SB to Charlotte one day. They can spend cash over cap to get players just like he spent big bucks for coaches but didn't have to worry about a salary cap or have to disclose the salaries.

Damn good question. Looking at how we could have been offensively with him here, I think it was a mistake. But I know they were thinking to get as many picks as they could while he was healthy given his injury concerns. It wasn't all about the money.

Ancient history. The contracts we have given out lately appear much better but you can always find a few bad ones