Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we expect a trade?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

G man doesn't seem like the type to have value right in front of him and not be able to use it to its full potential. Case in point .. Benjamin.. The guy needs time to get up to speed. Nothing wrong with that we have a qb that can move and extend plays. But simply put.. We need oline help. We have 2 to caliber de's on this team.. And drafted another.. In the mean time we have a patch further secondary and Byron bell starting.. Something is wrong with this picture. Gettleman has something up his sleeve.. I believe there is a trade coming.. But who? Man for man with dwill? (we drafted a brawler that ran for 1700 years with 9 games over 100 and still have barner as well) or could it be the kraken for a starting olineman and yet another upside secondary player.. Something is coming.. I just can't put my finger on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have multiple players that with a trade instantly make another teams offense or defense much better but don't hurt us very much. Suffice to say the positions we have the best players at we also have a good amount of depth. I can't see gman not using that leverage to protect his franchise qb. If nothing else to get someone in thats young that can grow into his position starting as a rotator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night I was thinking trading DeAngelo to Tennessee straight up for Roos. It would allow Sankey to be mentored by a great vet and we shore up the OL, win win

Sent from my LG-P769 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see a trade coming, but at this point, I would trade DeAngelo and Stewart for 7th rounders just to dump their contracts.

Trading them still wouldn't help our cap. Just comes down to when to start cutting them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night I was thinking trading DeAngelo to Tennessee straight up for Roos. It would allow Sankey to be mentored by a great vet and we shore up the OL, win win

Sent from my LG-P769 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

have you contact the front office about this yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night I was thinking trading DeAngelo to Tennessee straight up for Roos. It would allow Sankey to be mentored by a great vet and we shore up the OL, win win

Sent from my LG-P769 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

That isn't a win win. Tenn would be a laughing stock if they did that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...