Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting OTs in the NFL and where they were drafted


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

Basically, it's a shot in the dark past the 1st round.

 

That being said, we know what we have in Chandler and Bell which isn't terrible as many people want to believe.  Bell does seem bad at times but I don't think it's going to kill us to have him start another year.  

 

We got a very good RG to play so Chandler can focus solely on OT so I'm thinking we're in good shape.  

 

Cam is mobile and the and we're looking at Chandler/Bell---Amini---Kalil---Turner---Bell/Chandler

 

Don't underestimate Bond, Kugbila, Scott, and Garry Williams contributing as well.  

 

The way I'm thinking about the line: Our interior is a ton better with Kalil, Amini back, and Turner plus we have our RT back and are getting Chandler or better at LT.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the sky is falling crowd is finally seeing what most have been saying since the draft ended. Wasn't as deep as the talking heads touted it to be at T, starter wise anyway and the few we may have had on our board didn't out shine the people the team chose.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...