Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Protective order against Hardy dismissed


jamos14

Recommended Posts

Accuser, Nicole Holder did not show up to court.  Judge dismissed the protective order.

 

Apparently, she also switched attorneys from the one she had yesterday.

 

 

Goodwin said there were irreconcilable differences between he and his client. He is not sure if she has new representation.

 

 

Last time he withdrew from a case was 1996.  

 

 

My personal feelings is he doesn't want his reputation as an attorney sullied by an obvious lying.  Can't think of any other reason he would withdraw.

 

 

 

Things are getting more strange by the hour.

 

 

 

 

 

Info from Person twitter.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's civil not criminal.

 

Doesn't matter, I don't care if she goes to jail, but she needs to pay.  The new trend of women falsely claiming assault/rape in order to extort money or try to maintain their reputation, has to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is how it always goes.  the woman sobers up and realizes mistake.  she won't show to court and this will be dismissed after a couple appearances by hardy.  hardy will only need to get this expunged from record, but he's already been hit where it hurts most -- public image.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is how it always goes.  the woman sobers up and realizes mistake.  she won't show to court and this will be dismissed after a couple appearances by hardy.  hardy will only need to get this expunged from record, but he's already been hit where it hurts most -- public image.  

Regarding your username, remember, they weren't AK-47's, they were "automatic looking weapons." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...