Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miami Heat vs. San Antonio Spurs


Recommended Posts

It's a rematch of the finals of last year. Tim Duncan and the San Antonio Spurs will get one more shot at LeBron James and the defending champion Miami Heat.

Starters

Heat:

Mario Chalmers

Dwyane Wade

LeBron James

Shane Battier

Chris Bosh

Spurs:

Tony Parker

Danny Green

Kawhi Leonard

Tim Duncan

Thiago Splitter

I have a feeling, and i think that the spurs will end up winning this series. But I'm going against that, My Prediction:

Heat in

post-14499-140173824234_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Really pulling for the Spurs in this series.

 

But, Parker and Duncan are no spring chickens.  If it goes 7 games, I just don't know if the Spurs will have enough gas in the tank.

 

Would love to see Spurs win and let Duncan walk into sunset with ring one last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really pulling for the Spurs in this series.

But, Parker and Duncan are no spring chickens. If it goes 7 games, I just don't know if the Spurs will have enough gas in the tank.

Tony Parker just turned 32 on May 17th. He's younger than D-Wade and only 2 years older than LeBron & Bosh.

People have talked like he's 40 years old for 4-5 years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony Parker just turned 32 on May 17th. He's younger than D-Wade and only 2 years older than LeBron & Bosh.

People have talked like he's 40 years old for 4-5 years now.

You do realize he's saying that because Parker is injured, right?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the Spurs will win the series because they are a better team now than last year and the heat aren't as good as they were last year

That is the conventional wisdom now everyone is saying exactly this. But people have to remember LeBron is the best player in the world by a long shot, and I can't see him letting the spurs win. But I'm really unsure of how well the team around him will perform. We also have to remember Gary Neal who lit the Miami heat up from down town last year and was a monumental part in their success against Miami in the finals last year, is now a Charlotte hornet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pulling for both teams really.  That makes it nice and stress free. 

 

I might have a slight preference to SA because I would like to see Duncan get one more and his chances are running out, whereas, Lebron is so good he will likely have several more opportunities before his window closes

 

I will take SA in 6

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...