Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton thinks Nate Chandler is somehow in this picture


Recommended Posts

I think Chandler might actually be one of those "answer on the roster" guys

I'm back and forth on that.

If Nate Chandler is the better option at left tackle, cool...except that means putting Byron Bell back at right tackle after the team has gone on record saying he's better suited to the left side.

What to do... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did earlier in the day. He changed it once he realized it, I'm sure.

Newton is arguably the best writer covering the Panthers right now (I'd say it's between him and Bill Voth). He's been in the locker room and seen both guys plenty of times (Wharton too). At the very least, ya gotta figure he'd know their jersey numbers.

I seriously doubt he's the one that made the mistake. More likely one of ESPN's web guys as he was laying out the page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoyed learning that Bell went to University of Mexico. Good to know we are scouting everywhere not just the States and Canada.

 

Always thought he went to... University of New Mexico but I guess its all the same lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what happen when you don't follow a team and too lazy for due diligence and then start typing.

Not gonna lie. I have to wonder if you are talking about yourself...or the folks responsible for the article?

Either way, this is funny poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what happen when you don't follow a team and too lazy for due diligence and then start typing.

 

The writer doesn't choose the photo, write the caption, or write the headline.That would be the Copy Editor and Photo Editor. I'm sure you knew that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...