Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Offseason Trade/Free Agency Thread


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Irving just got a max deal.

And the NBA breathes a sigh of release. They can sleep a little easier knowing that money still talks. This is Irving's first big payday, so him taking it is understandable. Cleveland was desperate to keep him for PR reasons more than anything, so them offering it also is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to remain reserved about free agency.  keep in mind this is the same front office that just a week ago let Affalo slip through their fingers for a 2nd round pick.

You're talking about the Magic right?  

 

Did you want the Hornets to offer MKG, Henderson, the 24th, and the 9th for a slightly above average player.   I'm more excited about what Hairston can bring.

 

We tried....the Magic we're just looking to shed salary and to suck again.  We can't control that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're talking about the Magic right?

Did you want the Hornets to offer MKG, Henderson, the 24th, and the 9th for a slightly above average player. I'm more excited about what Hairston can bring.

We tried....the Magic we're just looking to shed salary and to suck again. We can't control that.

Lol, the magic GOT the player they wanted 2 years ago in the draft but missed out on. Its as simple as that.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're talking about the Magic right?  

 

Did you want the Hornets to offer MKG, Henderson, the 24th, and the 9th for a slightly above average player.   I'm more excited about what Hairston can bring.

 

We tried....the Magic we're just looking to shed salary and to suck again.  We can't control that.

 

no I am saying we could have done Denvers deal with no problems. Charlotte traded all their 2nd round picks anyways.  I cant figure out how they didnt walk away with affalo and denver did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to remain reserved about free agency. keep in mind this is the same front office that just a week ago let Affalo slip through their fingers for a 2nd round pick.

I think the only way we would've got Affalo was by giving up the 24 pick. They didn't need Henderson or his contract so I just didn't see it happening
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no I am saying we could have done Denvers deal with no problems. Charlotte traded all their 2nd round picks anyways. I cant figure out how they didnt walk away with affalo and denver did.

Its simple fam, Orlando didn't want Gerald and had a strong previous interest in Evan. And Orlando was gonna draft him at 18 in 2012 but Denver took him at 17. So when Denver offered them a player they always wanted they jumped. Plus if you were them would you want Gerald at his age or Evan at 20 whose a knockdown shooter.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its simple fam, Orlando didn't want Gerald and had a strong previous interest in Evan. And Orlando was gonna draft him at 18 in 2012 but Denver took him at 17. So when Denver offered them a player they always wanted they jumped. Plus if you were them would you want Gerald at his age or Evan at 20 whose a knockdown shooter.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

r u retarded? Denver drafted at #20 after orlando

Link to comment
Share on other sites

r u retarded? Denver drafted at #20 after orlando

Bro I couldn't remember the specifics. All I remember is they were high on Evan and they got another chance to get him. It's still simple to understand

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no I am saying we could have done Denvers deal with no problems. Charlotte traded all their 2nd round picks anyways.  I cant figure out how they didnt walk away with affalo and denver did.

It wasn't about the draft picks.  It was about the salary cap.  There's no way we trade for Afflalo without having Henderson involved in the deal.  Henderson;s contract is what broke that deal apart.  I would be more upset if we were stuck with the contracts of both Afflalo and Henderson.  Especially when our secondary option (Hairston) wasn't a bad option.

 

So Cho was smart.  He traded the 2nds for future picks and cash considerations that help offset Henderson's bad contract.  

 

You make it seem like the 2nd round pick the Magic received is more appealing then the 1st we offered.  We could have gotten him....but we'd be stuck with Hendo too, and I mean really, who else would we have traded that would have made it worth it?  Only other guy is Garry Neal....but we're not trading our shooters when we're in need of them.

 

Afflalo is not a superstar or just a regular ol star for that matter, he'd be a great role player on a good team, but he doesn't put teams over the top otherwise the Magic wouldn't have sucked.  If we would have landed him, and had to keep Henderson it would have severely handicapped us going into the Stephenson sweepstakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...