Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Right now, we're the 2002-2004 Falcons


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

If you look at the way the team approached last season, you'll notice they concentrated a fair amount on the run game.  In this case, a run game which included (some would say was powered by) our quarterback.  The passing game was there and decent, but it was the run game that was the engine of the offense.  And on the other side, an attacking, smothering defense.

 

Now, if you think back about ten years or so, that style of play might seem familiar.

 

It's what the Atlanta Falcons of the early 2000s used when Vick was at his peak with them.  Their run game, Vick included, was deadly.  The pass game - at its best - was complementary but hardly frightening.

 

So now that we have a quarterback who can beat teams with his legs, here we were last season using a similar approach.

 

Aaaaand honestly, I'm not in favor of that :(

 

Why?

 

The Falcons taking that approach was understandable, even wise when you think about it.  Vick was an amazing runner, but a mediocre passer.  Teams knew the best game plan against the Falcons was to concentrate on the run and force Vick to throw.  Hence, the 'mush rush' by many, except the Bucs who always used heavy pressure to flush Vick to his right where he wasn't as effective.

 

Still, the run game was so good that even when teams did their best to take it away, they didn't always succeed.

 

So now, we take a similar path because we have a quarterback with a similar profile, right?

 

Cool, except we don't :unsure:

 

Cam Newton is, in only his fourth year, a better passer than Michael Vick was even in his best years.  Yes, he's also a great runner and it's wise to use that quality and/or the threat of it.  But in the process, let's not get unbalanced too far toward the run.

 

Now I'd imagine the coaches know this, so perhaps it's just been the lack of a deep receiving corps that's forced them into that approach.  It seems more logical when you think about it.  Newton, although sometimes lacking consistency, is still a good passer, but of course someone has to catch the ball.

 

Truthfully though, the reason behind why we went that route last year doesn't really matter.

 

The bottom line for me is that I don't want to see us looking that way again this coming season

 

With a deeper receiving corps, another year under Newton's belt and a super-talented mega-tall receiver as a target, there's no reason why we shouldn't air it out as much as anybody.  Rivera's preference has always been to be able to attack teams any way we choose, and that's exactly what I want to see in the year ahead.

 

Here's hoping we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like this comparison. Nope, not one bit.

1620371_4042612999389_2031858434_n.jpg?o

 

I expect some flack for comparing us to the Falcons :lol:

 

To be fair, those teams won their fair share of games, made it into the playoffs and almost made the Super Bowl.

 

I'm hoping for better though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Cam's passing ability should be highlighted, but the Seahawks just dominated the Super Bowl by having an elite defense and an elite run game to control the clock. What we really need is balance. We need teams to stack the box for the run so we can be able to get single coverage and get a chunk through the air. Then they drop a couple back, and bam we smash it right down the middle for 5 yards or more. Need to keep them guessing. But I will say controlling the clock and pounding the ball by running it and using duel TEs could work really really well for us. I don't think we should emphasize passing this year much more than last year just because our tackles are so questionable. Our WRs are better than last year and with Cam, good enough to be a top 10 team in passing stats. But I don't think we can do that until we've got some safety for Cam in the pocket. Our interior line should be much better so I think we do need to go with the run game here. The difference between us and those Falcons? Our defense vs. theirs. We have an elite defense now and should build around that more than our offense. They had in 2002 the 8th ranked defense, in 2003, the 30th and in 2004 the 14th. We need to be consistently in the top 3 defensively. The Patriots won 3 Super Bowls by being efficient on offense with the run game and a game manager QB (lets be honest, that's what Brady was at that point in his career). They were built around a balanced offense slightly leaned toward the run and a top 3 (or #1) defense. Could we be a powerhouse passing team like the recent Patriots or the recent Broncos? Sure. But I don't think we want to be or should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect some flack for comparing us to the Falcons :lol:

To be fair, those teams won their fair share of games, made it into the playoffs and almost made the Super Bowl.

I'm hoping for better though.

Welp they did have our number for a while so I guess we better hope the majority of our opponents are built like the 2002-2004 panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Cam's passing ability should be highlighted, but the Seahawks just dominated the Super Bowl by having an elite defense and an elite run game to control the clock. What we really need is balance. We need teams to stack the box for the run so we can be able to get single coverage and get a chunk through the air. Then they drop a couple back, and bam we smash it right down the middle for 5 yards or more. Need to keep them guessing. But I will say controlling the clock and pounding the ball by running it and using duel TEs could work really really well for us. I don't think we should emphasize passing this year much more than last year just because our tackles are so questionable. Our WRs are better than last year and with Cam, good enough to be a top 10 team in passing stats. But I don't think we can do that until we've got some safety for Cam in the pocket. Our interior line should be much better so I think we do need to go with the run game here. The difference between us and those Falcons? Our defense vs. theirs. We have an elite defense now and should build around that more than our offense. They had in 2002 the 8th ranked defense, in 2003, the 30th and in 2004 the 14th. We need to be consistently in the top 3 defensively. The Patriots won 3 Super Bowls by being efficient on offense with the run game and a game manager QB (lets be honest, that's what Brady was at that point in his career). They were built around a balanced offense slightly leaned toward the run and a top 3 (or #1) defense. Could we be a powerhouse passing team like the recent Patriots or the recent Broncos? Sure. But I don't think we want to be or should be. 

 

And here's the thing on the Seahawks...

 

Seattle turned Wilson into a game manager.  Yes, it worked, but Newton is too dynamic to be put in that sort of box and I don't think it'd be a wise use of his talents.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp they did have our number for a while so I guess we better hope the majority of our opponents are built like the 2002-2004 panthers

 

I know in 2002 Del Rio had no clue how to defend Vick.  Honestly, his career since the Panthers hadn't exactly shown strength against other mobile QBs either.

 

Trgovac might have had a better handle on the concepts (surprising as that sounds) but until we drafted Thomas Davis he didn't have the right tools for the job.

 

Once TD came aboard though, things started changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...