Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Labor laws

cookinbrak

By cookinbrak,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Apparently, I wasn't doing the work assigned to me. However, I have 2 copies of the same work order with completely different things on them. Same WO number, time, and date, just written 4 days apart with completely different things on them. They just went back in the computer and changed stuff.

 

The property I worked at was for sale, and if we stayed throughout the changeover, we were due stay-on bonuses. I think this was their way out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Apparently, I wasn't doing the work assigned to me. However, I have 2 copies of the same work order with completely different things on them. Same WO number, time, and date, just written 4 days apart with completely different things on them. They just went back in the computer and changed stuff.

The property I worked at was for sale, and if we stayed throughout the changeover, we were due stay-on bonuses. I think this was their way out of it.

Did you sign a stay on agreement that outlined what was required for you to receive the bonus? If so, there may be validity to them trying to make it look like you did not fulfill that contract.

If not, there us no real reason for them to falsify anything to make you look incompetent. As an at will state, they could let you go for absolutely no reason...as long as it was not discriminatory nor was retaliation protected under the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I worked at an apartment complex. One of the make-readys had 3 different lists of things- one on Thursday, one Saturday, one Monday. I did everything on all 3 lists. the Thursday and Monday lists are on the same work order, they went into the computer and changed stuff. "All of this should have been done before the move-in." They changed the lists after the fact.

 

They don't know that I have the copies of both work orders. They don't keep copies of the work orders, they log them into the computer and shred them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...