Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

On Cam Newton's Playing Status...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Am I really seeing the Brady/Bledsoe scenario being compared to Cam/Anderson?

I hope not.

Only if you are not following along. The point was that he thinks that Belicheck would gamble and play Cam hurt or not and I showed where he put in a backup due to injury and then next week chose the backup over the starter. So he doesn't always gamble or take chances. He puts in who he thinks is the best option to win.

It really isn't fun when I have to explain it to you so you can keep up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only if you are not following along. The point was that he thinks that Belicheck would gamble and play Cam hurt or not and I showed where he put in a backup due to injury and then next week chose the backup over the starter. So he doesn't always gamble or take chances. He puts in who he thinks is the best option to win.

It really isn't fun when I have to explain it to you so you can keep up.

 

Bledsoe at that point in his career as an impact to his offense was not even remotely comparable to Cam Newton right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will see what happens Sunday.

Whoever plays, I am most worried about our power RBs not being featured early to aid our QB

And I am afraid we will be stupid and not take what the defense is giving us and try to establish the run with 3 or 4 initial

3 and outs. If Tampa stacks the box only a fool will keep trying to run when that is what they are taking away. Middle school coaches know you have to run when they are in pass defense and you have to pass when they are trying to stop the run. You have a gameplan but you have to adapt along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your fears are simple assumptions.

If your argument is that he might get hit by a large guy, then I guess we should cancel the season. Because that happens to all players.

That is a given he will be hit by big guys. Tampa is going to blitz often and with 6 or 7 guys. I know Lovie and Tampa so my assumptions are going to happen. You will be the one to find out what I already know.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bledsoe at that point in his career as an impact to his offense was not even remotely comparable to Cam Newton right now.

The Problem with debating you is that you make off the wall statements not related to the argument. No is comparing Cam to Bledsoe. CRA mentioned he thought Belicheck would gamble and I showed where he didn't. Anything else is simply made up in your mind.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bledsoe at that point in his career as an impact to his offense was not even remotely comparable to Cam Newton right now.

Nor is DA a young drafted potential prospect for the future

But 55 was simply making a point which I get....he wasn't comparing players but focusing on the who gives you the best chance to win approach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is that starting Anderson could be a bigger gamble than starting Cam. Sure the reason Anderson will start is because of injury if he does indeed start. But what if he plays great and we win big. Sure Newton is the starter but what if he is still nursing ribs and he can't run and struggles coming back in his first start. Do you put in Anderson?

No you just go with your starter because Anderson can handle being a backup better than Cam. Sure of Cam is hurt then he will understand.. And he has been great and a big cheerleader of everyone when he has not played. But that was preseason and this is for real. If he thinks he is 90% do you have to start him and let him take his shots ? Most pundits say you don't replace a starter unless he is really injured because it undermines the player perception of the coach's confidence in the player.

So is it a bigger gamble to start Anderson over a limited Cam ((who could think he is fine) for injury and because he is playing better right now )than it is to put in Cam for confidence building( and he needs the reps) and risk the injury. Look at McCown and Chicago. When Cutler went down and McCown came in and played pretty well a quarterback controversy developed at least among fans.

I suspect part o f the reason that McCown is gone besides the money is that he created a big controversy with Cutler. Can't have 2 guys who want to start on the same team unless one is good with the backup role. McCown wanted to be a starter and played well nought to earn it and Cutler is probably glad not to have McCown looking over his shoulder.

The safe bet is start Cam and leave him in even if he struggles. That is what Fox would have done and he is as safe as they come. If Ron started Anderson and upsets the applecart given you know Cam wants to play no matter what. Then he is Riverboat and playing the hot hand. Doing what coaches intent on winning do. Honestly Ron seems like a real player's coach so it will be hard for him not to start Newton unless he really is in pain. If Newton thinks he can play then the safe money is letting him do it to manage the locker room. The wildcard in all this is Gettleman. What does he want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is that starting Anderson could be a bigger gamble than starting Cam. Sure the reason Anderson will start is because of injury if he does indeed start. But what if he plays great and we win big. Sure Newton is the starter but what if he is still nursing ribs and he can't run and struggles coming back in his first start. Do you put in Anderson?

No you just go with your starter because Anderson can handle being a backup better than Cam. Sure of Cam is hurt then he will understand.. And he has been great and a big cheerleader of everyone when he has not played. But that was preseason and this is for real. If he thinks he is 90% do you have to start him and let him take his shots ? Most pundits say you don't replace a starter unless he is really injured because it undermines the coach's confidence in the player.

So is it a bigger gamble to start Anderson over a limited Cam ((who could think he is fine) for injury and because he is playing better right now )than it is to put in Cam for confidence building( and he needs the reps) and risk the injury. Look at McCown and Chicago. When Cutler went down and McCown came in and played pretty well there became a QB controversy . I suspect part o f the reason that McCown is gone besides the money is that he created a big controversy with Cutler. Can't have 2 guys who want to start on the same team unless one is good with the backup role. McCown wanted to be a starter and played well nought to earn it and Cutler is probably glad not to have McCown looking over his shoulder.

The safe bet is start Cam and leave him in even if he struggles. That is what Fox would have done and he is as safe as they come. If Ron started Anderson and upsets the applecart given you know Cam wants to play no matter what. Then he is Riverboat and playing the hot hand. Doing what coaches intent on winning do. Honestly Ron seems like a real player's coach so it will be hard for him not to start Newton unless he really is in pain. If Newton thinks he can play then the safe money is letting him do it to manage the locker room. The wildcard in all this is Gettleman. What does he want?

We are talking about Derek Anderson, playing in an offense with a virtually new offensive line, no speed on the outside, best WR is a rookie, and Mike Shula calling the plays. My God, please let Cam sit so we can get this poo out of the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Problem with debating you is that you make off the wall statements not related to the argument. No is comparing Cam to Bledsoe. CRA mentioned he thought Belicheck would gamble and I showed where he didn't. Anything else is simply made up in your mind.

You can insult me until you are blue in the face, but it still doesn't make your hypothetical any less asinine.

Thanks to CRA for at least attempting to explain it on your behalf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers quarterback Cam Newton came into work Saturday morning feeling good, but his status for Sunday’s season opener is still very much up in the air.
 
Newton, who is listed as questionable with cracked ribs, threw passes and took first-team reps for the first time this week during Friday’s walkthrough. The fact he got through that without any ill-effects is a big step as he tries to convince the Panthers he should start against the Bucs. A final decision is still expected on Sunday.
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...